----- Forwarded message from "neil & mim" <neil_mim2@bigpond.com>
-----
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 07:13:36 +0000
Subject:
To: <senator.abetz@aph.gov.au>, <senator.arbib@aph.gov.au>, <senator.adams@aph.gov.au>, <senator.back@aph.gov.au>, <senator.barnett@aph.gov.au>, <senator.bernardi@aph.gov.au>, <senator.bilyki@aph.gov.au>, <senatorbirmingham@aph.gov.au>, <senator.bishop@aph.gov.au>, <senator.boswell@aph.gov.au>, <senator.boyce@aph.gov.au>, <senator.brandis@aph.gov.au>, <senator.brown@aph.gov.au>, <senatorbushby@aph.gov.au>, <senatorcameron@aph.gov.au>, <senator.carr@aph.gov.au>, <senator.cash@aph.gov.au>, <senator.colbeck@aph.gov.au>, <senator.collins@aph.gov.au>, <senator.conroy@aph.gov.au>, <senator.coonan@aph.gov.au>, <senator.cormann@aph.gov.au>, <senator.crossin@aph.gov.au>, <senator.eggleston@aph.gov.au>, <senator.evans@aph.gov.au>, <senator.farrell@aph.gov.au>, <senator.faulkner@aph.gov.au>, <senator.feeney@aph.gov.au>, <senator.ferguson@aph.gov.au>, <senator.fielding@aph.gov.au>, <senator.fierravanti-wells@aph.gov.au>, <senatorfifield@aph.gov.au>, <senator.fisher@aph.gov.au>, <senatorforshaw@aph.gov.au>, <senator.furner@aph.gov.au>, <senatorhanson-young@aph.gov.au>, <senator.heffeman@aph.gov.au>, <senator.hogg@aph.gov.au>, <senator.humphries@aph.gov.au>, <senator.hurley@aph.gov.au>, <senatorhutchins@aph.gov.au>, <senatorjohnston@aph.gov.au>, <senatorjoyce@aph.gov.au>, <senator.kroger@aph.gov.au>, <senatorludlam@aph.gov.au>, <senator.ludwig@aph.gov.au>, <senatorlundy@aph.gov.au>, <senator.ian.macdonald@aph.gov.au>, <senatormcewen@aph.gov.au>, <senatormcgauran@aph.gov.au>, <senator.mclucas@aph.gov.au>, <senator.marshall@aph.gov.au>, <senator.mason@aph.gov.au>, <senator.milne@aph.gov.au>, <senator.minchin@aph.gov.au>, <senator.moore@aph.gov.au>, <senator.nash@aph.gov.au>, <senator.obrien@aph.gov.au>, <senatorpayne@aph.gov.au>, <senator.polley@aph.gov.au>, <senator.pratt@aph.gov.au>, <senatorronaldson@aph.gov.au>, <senator.ryan@aph.gov.au>, <senator.scullion@aph.gov.au>, <senator.sherry@aph.gov.au>, <senator.siewert@aph.gov.au>, <senator.stephens@aph.gov.au>, <senator.sterle@aph.gov.au>, <senator.troeth@aph.gov.au>, <senator.trood@aph.gov.au>, <senator.trood@aph.gov.au>, <senator.wong@aph.gov.au>, <senator.wortley@aph.gov.au>, <senator.xenophon@aph.gov.au>
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2013 07:13:36 +0000
Subject:
To: <senator.abetz@aph.gov.au>, <senator.arbib@aph.gov.au>, <senator.adams@aph.gov.au>, <senator.back@aph.gov.au>, <senator.barnett@aph.gov.au>, <senator.bernardi@aph.gov.au>, <senator.bilyki@aph.gov.au>, <senatorbirmingham@aph.gov.au>, <senator.bishop@aph.gov.au>, <senator.boswell@aph.gov.au>, <senator.boyce@aph.gov.au>, <senator.brandis@aph.gov.au>, <senator.brown@aph.gov.au>, <senatorbushby@aph.gov.au>, <senatorcameron@aph.gov.au>, <senator.carr@aph.gov.au>, <senator.cash@aph.gov.au>, <senator.colbeck@aph.gov.au>, <senator.collins@aph.gov.au>, <senator.conroy@aph.gov.au>, <senator.coonan@aph.gov.au>, <senator.cormann@aph.gov.au>, <senator.crossin@aph.gov.au>, <senator.eggleston@aph.gov.au>, <senator.evans@aph.gov.au>, <senator.farrell@aph.gov.au>, <senator.faulkner@aph.gov.au>, <senator.feeney@aph.gov.au>, <senator.ferguson@aph.gov.au>, <senator.fielding@aph.gov.au>, <senator.fierravanti-wells@aph.gov.au>, <senatorfifield@aph.gov.au>, <senator.fisher@aph.gov.au>, <senatorforshaw@aph.gov.au>, <senator.furner@aph.gov.au>, <senatorhanson-young@aph.gov.au>, <senator.heffeman@aph.gov.au>, <senator.hogg@aph.gov.au>, <senator.humphries@aph.gov.au>, <senator.hurley@aph.gov.au>, <senatorhutchins@aph.gov.au>, <senatorjohnston@aph.gov.au>, <senatorjoyce@aph.gov.au>, <senator.kroger@aph.gov.au>, <senatorludlam@aph.gov.au>, <senator.ludwig@aph.gov.au>, <senatorlundy@aph.gov.au>, <senator.ian.macdonald@aph.gov.au>, <senatormcewen@aph.gov.au>, <senatormcgauran@aph.gov.au>, <senator.mclucas@aph.gov.au>, <senator.marshall@aph.gov.au>, <senator.mason@aph.gov.au>, <senator.milne@aph.gov.au>, <senator.minchin@aph.gov.au>, <senator.moore@aph.gov.au>, <senator.nash@aph.gov.au>, <senator.obrien@aph.gov.au>, <senatorpayne@aph.gov.au>, <senator.polley@aph.gov.au>, <senator.pratt@aph.gov.au>, <senatorronaldson@aph.gov.au>, <senator.ryan@aph.gov.au>, <senator.scullion@aph.gov.au>, <senator.sherry@aph.gov.au>, <senator.siewert@aph.gov.au>, <senator.stephens@aph.gov.au>, <senator.sterle@aph.gov.au>, <senator.troeth@aph.gov.au>, <senator.trood@aph.gov.au>, <senator.trood@aph.gov.au>, <senator.wong@aph.gov.au>, <senator.wortley@aph.gov.au>, <senator.xenophon@aph.gov.au>
Dear Senators
Your individual explanation within 7 days
would be appreciated
Signed Neil Lunney 1/215 Pierce Avenue,
Little Mountain 4551
Corporations Masquerading as Government in Australia & World
Wide
By Andy
Whitely Co-Founder of Wake Up World
The Great Seal of the United Kingdom, atop
the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Ac1900
Vs.
The Great Seal of Australia, a trademark registered with United
States Patent and Trademark Office.
Which represents real
(de jure) Government in Australia? Which is seen on
“Government” literature?
Would you be surprised to find a company with
the same name as your country registered with the Security and Exchange Commission (SEC) in Washington DC? Well,
guess what?! Among those listed as corporate entities by the United States
SEC are Israel, Turkey, Italy, Hungary, Sweden, Finland, Argentina, Colombia, Brazil, The Philippines, South Korea, Japan, Jamaica, South Africa, Canada, Australia… and
my personal favourite (and I quote) “Her Majesty the Queen in Right of the Province of Alberta as
represented by Alberta Investment Management Corp.”
Interesting! So what could all this mean? For
the purpose of this article we will follow the example of
Australia.
Australia… the lucky country
- SEC Entity Name: COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA
- SEC Central Index Key (CIK): 0000805157
- SEC Standard Industrial Code (SIC): 8880 (UNKNOWN)
- SEC Business Address: 1601 MASSACHUSETTS AVE NW WASHINGTON DC 20036
- Fiscal Year End: 0630
Well, that certainly raises some
questions!
Why is a company called ‘COMMONWEALTH OF
AUSTRALIA’ registered in Washington DC? What reason could there be
for a country to be registered as a company?
By definition, aren’t corporate and
government entities mutually exclusive? And doesn’t government regulate
companies?
Why would Australia be registered with the
SEC in the United States? And why would it provide a ‘Prospectus’ and annual
‘Economic and Fiscal Outlook’ documents to the SEC? And be subject to SEC
regulation?
Why is the Great Seal of
Australia a trademark registered with United States Patent and Trademark
Office?
Could the ‘Australian Government’ be a
corporate entity masquerading as real government, for profit, and not for the
purpose of governance? Does the ‘Australian Government’ truly represent “the
people” and not shareholders in another country?
Why do today’s government departments have
corporate mission statements like “we provide services on BEHALF of
government” and “our CLIENTS
include government…”?
What happened to “we ARE government”?? Does
this suggest they are NOT true government, but a company masquerading as
government?
If a company registered in Washington DC is
falsely claiming government status in Australia, what happened to the real (de
jure) government with a similar name? And when?
And are the laws in Australia therefore just
rules for employees and contractors of the corporation?
Interesting. Let’s look a little
closer…
Perhaps it is a requirement that the
Commonwealth of Australia registers as a company entity in order to trade with
the United States of America. Are all the other countries who trade with the
United States also registered on the American SEC? Is ‘the United States of
America’ also registered with ASIC, the Australian Securities & Investments
Commission? And is Australia similarly registered with the corresponding trade
regulators in other countries?
The answer appears to be NO.
International trade implies mutual agreement;
reciprocity; a common method of exchange. But the reality is that the
‘COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA’ is registered as a corporate entity with the United
States SEC, but not the other way around. There appear to be no comparable
corporate entities registered in other countries with which Australia trades.
And nations ranking among the United States’ biggest trading partners do NOT
have corporate avatars registered with the American SEC. Perhaps registration in
Washington DC is for the purpose of trading Government Bonds.
Interesting…
… But this strange corporate entity is only
half the story. Before government bonds can even exist, surely there must first
be a legitimate government.
Government and the role of Governor-General
in Australia
In Australia, the Governor-General is the
representative of the Monarch (currently Queen Elizabeth II) and the
Administrator of Government. Given that the Governor-General administers
government in Australia, government can only exist in Australia with a valid
Governor-General. The Governor-General is reliant upon the existence of the
‘Office of Governor-General’, which was originally constituted by the late Queen
Victoria in Letters Patent dated 29th October 1900, passed under the Monarch’s
seal – the Great Seal Of The United Kingdom (view Letters Patent 1900).
The power and authority to revoke, alter or
amend those Letters Patent was reserved by the late Queen Victoria to her heirs
and successors. Given those Letters Patent were issued under the ‘Great Seal of the United
Kingdom’, surely any revocation, alteration or amendment must be
issued by an heir and successor under the same Seal.
So what’s the problem?
In 1984, Letters Patent supposedly revoked
the original Letters Patent of 1900 and provided new provisions for the Office
of Governor-General (view Letters Patent 1984). This happened
under the ‘Great Seal of Australia’, which we already know is a corporate
trademark registered with the United States Patent & Trademark Office in the
U.S. (view
registration)
Surely such an attempt at revocation cannot
therefore be lawful? And if not, what Office is the Governor-General in
Australia presently occupying? Is the person we call “Governor-General” truly a
representative of an “heir and successor” to the late Queen
Victoria?
The answer appears to be NO.
Given that the Governor-General appoints
Ministers, Judges, Commissioners and Justices of the Peace, and ascribes Royal
Assent as the Monarch’s representative in Australia – using the Monarch’s Seal – in the
absence of a valid Governor-General, are there any legitimate government offices
in Australia?
Again… the answer appears to be
NO.
So let’s test the theory…
A case study
Wake Up World friend and colleague Scott
Bartle documented his recent dealings with
‘Australian Customs & Border Protection Service’ in his self-funded
documentary “What The FUQ? – Frequently Unanswered Questions of the Australian
Government”.
This simple, concise and sometimes hilarious
case-study follows Scott’s ongoing interactions with a supposed “government”
entity that simply does not behave as a genuine government agency
should.
And all he did was ask them to demonstrate
their validity!
Documentary Trailer – What The FUQ Trailer
(2:47 mins)
To view this documentary in full, Click here. I highly recommended
it.
So… IS the “Australian Government” the same
government the original Office of Governor-General was intended to
Administer?
It’s a question that officials at all levels
of “Australian Government” have seem unwilling or unable to answer. Some readers
may think I’m a crack-pot for even asking the question. “Break out the tin-foil
hats!” they’ll cry! But please… Before you form an opinion or post a comment on
this article, ask the Australian Government the same question
yourself:
It is your right, after all. And there are
certainly some details that don’t add up. But it gets better….
That’s odd, they certainly don’t ACT like a
true government.
At first “Government” may just ignore you.
But since anyone claiming government status has a responsibility to prove it,
their silence is very indicative, don’t you think? So push your Government a
little further, and see what happens when you really start to question who’s
who. Taxes & fines are suddenly waived, and miraculously, licenses &
permits are no longer required! And it doesn’t stop there.
Does this sound like the behaviour of
legitimate government? NO, it does not. If challenged, does a legitimate
government not simply demonstrate its validity and continue to act within its
lawful authority? Or does legitimate government exempt that person’s
responsibilities and wave them through the gates, quickly, quietly and with a
minimum of fuss? “Nothing to see here!”
Is this situation unique to
Australia?
Let’s find out!
To our friends and readers from the
Commonwealth of Australia, we recommend you contact your local Members and Senators and ask them
one simple question:
Can you please demonstrate that today’s
Office of Governor-General is the same Office that was constituted by the late
Queen Victoria in Letters Patent of 1900?
To our friends and readers outside Australia,
we recommend you identify the documents that established the original offices of
government in your country, then ask one simple question of your
government representatives:
Can you please demonstrate that today’s
government is the same one as established at the inception of this
country?
Demonstrating its own legitimacy is a very
simple thing that every government agency should be able to do. And in a true
democracy, silence is an unacceptable response of government to questions of its
very legitimacy. But today the “Australian Government” appears unwilling or
unable to prove its legitimacy.
Is yours?
It only takes a few minutes to write to your
local member’s office. Please come back to Wake Up World and tell our readers
how your enquiry was met. Silence? Jargon? Or a simple demonstration of your
government’s legitimacy?
We’d love to hear your stories, so please
leave a comment or send us an email
So what the FUQ do we do next?
Written enquiries made to Ministers and Government agencies, to the
Office of the Prime Minister and to the Office of Governor General remain
unanswered. So in the absence of a response from Government, Wake Up World
supports respectfully escalating
this matter to the current Monarch, Her Majesty, The Queen.
Surely Her Majesty must know the answer; why
a corporation in the United States bears the name ‘COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA’;
why in 1984 her authority to amend the provisions for the Office of
Governor-General was granted on a company letterhead; why those claiming to
represent true government in Australia have been unable to prove that status;
and why some, when challenged, may suddenly overlook one’s obligations and run
silently in the other direction.
…and ask Her Majesty for the
truth.
SHARE THIS ARTICLE
…we all have a right to
know.
HOLD YOUR GOVERNMENT
ACCOUNTABLE
…it is just one simple
question.
In a true democracy, silence is an
unacceptable answer of government to questions of its legitimacy.
About the Author
Andy Whiteley is co-founder of Wake Up
World.
Special thanks Scott Bartle for travelling
4,000 kms to help join the dots.
