Date: Thu, May 2, 2013 at 11:01 AM
Subject: Why This Corporate Government is Not Our Government
To:
Why This Corporate Government is Not Our Government
To read the full package of information including some evidentiary documents
please go to Larry Hannigan's Australia
http://larryhannigan.com/
First it is vital to understand just who We, the People are
constitutionally.
a.. The Commonwealth is the People - not the landmass known as Australia
b.. The Commonwealth Parliament is the Parliament of the People.
c.. Common Law is the law of the People.
d.. Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain and Ireland is the
sovereign of the People.
e.. The People are Her subjects.
f.. Her Majesty owns the land mass known as Australia, in trust for the
People
g.. Her Majesty is the keeper of the Law of the People, the Law of the
Land
Therefore, all judges, police, politicians and etc can only deal with the
People in any judicial and political manner by
a.. swearing an oath to Her Majesty
which gives them Her authority to arrest or render a judgment, or make a law
which will affect the People.
Without that authority, any of those kind of actions are null and void.
That is why, in the Courts and Parliament, the representatives of Her
Majesty sit under a picture of Her or a replica of Her Royal Seal - to
signify they hold Her authority in that place and that position.
That is why all acts of Parliament dealing with all civil and political
matters of the People are sealed to Our Queen, under her Royal Seal. Because
they are part of the part of the contractual relatonship we have with Her
and Her Parliament.
Now what keeps the People to this structure of civil and political rights is
the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution (UK) 1900 inter alia Commonwealth
of Australia Constitution 1900.
This is a commercial contract,
a.. signed by the Hand of Her Majesty, Queen Victoria,
b.. sealed by Her Royal Seal (the lion and the unicorn)
c.. and delivered to the People with whom She has the contract - the
People in the Commonwealth of Australia.
This contract is NOT and has NEVER been made with any government. It was
made with Her Majesty.
Government, as such, belongs to Her Majesty, administering and protecting
Her assets.
As subjects of Her Majesty, we are the beneficiary of Her assets, however,
Government, in their dealings with the People, are bound to the People's
"rules", as found in our Constitution.
Her Majesty CAN NOT remove Herself from that contract as it is binding on
the Heirs and Successors to the throne in perpetuity.
Only the People of the Commonwealth can remove the contract.
Hence our Constitution is referred to as indissoluble - unable to be
terminated or annuled.
The People of the Commonwealth pay Her Majesty $19 million dollars per year
as part of that contract.
As Her Majesty is the owner of the landmass known as Australia any purchase
of land is a commercial contract with Her.
Government are no more or less than agents in the sale. Stamp duty until
recently accumulated in order to supply government with the funds to buy
land back when necessary. That land would then return to being Crown lands.
(For all details on what you actually own when you purchase land please go
to earlier postings on this site.)
Regardless of whether the land has been onsold since the first sale, it
remains a commercial contract with Her in its inception, construction and
constitutional authority.
This is because in every sale, She remains part of the ownership via the
registration of minerals and other such physical elements of land.
This reservation has always AND must always be noted on the Deed of Title OR
the reservation is not lawful or valid.
And in the case a person dies without any heirs to inherit, the land reverts
to Her full ownership.
The right to own land is the foundation of all ownership rights, the ability
to inherit and etc.
The money of the People is money that Her Majesty authorises as the owner of
the land, which is the collatoral. This money must carry Her face and Her
Seal to signify that authority.
Without the Authority of the owner of the land - all other forms of money in
Australia have no value.
Why has our research led us to believe all governments since 1972 have been
Foreign governments to the People?
Because in 1973, the Parliament of the Commonwealth was given permission to
form a Research & Development arm, to capitalize on the mineral elements of
the land mass of Australia.
Because Her Majesty owned that land mass, this was done with Her Majesty's
permission as the Patron of that "arm."
And just as any company or corporation must have, the government claimed for
its Seal - the Great Seal of the Commonwealth - the kangaroo and the emu -
renamed the Great Seal of Australia.
From that time on, Australia should have had a constitutional parliament of
the People under the "Commonwealth", AND a government arm dealing with the
land under "Australia".
However, please note this could only be Crown land, because Her Majesty had
sold private land out of Her government's control UNLESS, they purchase the
land back and it returned to being Crown land.
Instead, as our research shows, the Parliament from Whitlam on, gradually
absorbed the Parliament of the People of the Commonwealth, turning it into
the Australian Parliament.
Creating the massive deception that Our Parliament was still in place, even
after it had completely disappeared by 1986.
An immediate and simple proof of that is that ALL government acts, since
1973, have been sealed to the Great Seal of Australia.
What is the significance of the Seal I have been asked?
The Seal on any legal document - and all Deeds and government acts, etc are
legal instruments - reflects the structure of law under which the document
can only and must only be recognized lawfully and administered.
By that I mean, if a document is sealed to the government of Russia, it has
absolutely no relevance in Australia.
Therefore, if the People are protected under the Royal Seal of Her Majesty,
and all relevant acts, laws, etc must be sealed to that Seal to hold lawful
authority over the People - then any act sealed to the new Australian
government can have no power over the People.
Thus making the laws of the Australian government, no more or less, foreign
to the People of the Commonwealth.
This is also vital in the Courts, because after firstly reworking all the
Commonwealth court acts back under the Great Seal, making our judicial
rights subect to the Australian government's courts - the judges began to
make their Oaths, not to Her Majesty OUR Queen, but to the Queen of
Australia - their Queen.
The judges are now called "corams" meaning an unelected judge, a person
sitting as a judge, but not a judge.
Therefore making the courts liable to uphold not our Common Law, but the
civil law of commerce, as practised by this Australian System of Government.
And to doubly keep the People well away from any Common Law, the sea
boundaries were extended around Australia, both outward and inward along
each State's coastline - the landmass was now legislatively covered in
"water", thus allowing maritime law to rule in the courts as well.
Under maritime law, the captain of the ship has total lawful control, making
all judicial rules. Common Law does not exist at sea.
Now, as the People CAN onlybe arrested, punished, sentenced, etc through
Common Law UNLESS they hold a commercial contract with any government
"department" or entity - the rise of registration, licensing, certification,
etc began in this country.
Suddenly it was a crime to do anything without being given permission from
some government agency.
Prior to the Australia Act 1986, which is the constitution of this corporate
government, followed by the States entering their own individual republican
agreement in 1999, then culminating in the full-blown Corporate Government
from 2000 onwards, the governmental structure operated under a sort of dual
system, whereby the People were "allowed" to retain some rights, in order to
give the semblance that all was still well.
From 2000 onwards that is no longer the case.
It is now impossible to plead common law rights of ownership in the courts
and as more and more people have suffered the consequences without
understanding how or why - the People are forced into obeying government
legislation and conforming to the rules of this foreign government.
Our Solution
We, the People hold a commercial contract with Her Majesty in the form of
the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution (UK) 1900 inter alia with the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900.
And we pay Her through that contract.
She is now being asked whether We, the People still hold that contract and
will She now abide by it to protect us and return to the People a
Commonealth Parliament.
If She does not, We the People of Australia can sue Her for breach of
contract.
If She does not, She will tell every other country that holds land under
contracts with Her - including Britain, India, Jamaica, Fiji, Singapore, the
Faulklands, NZ, Canada - that those contracts are breached and therefore
valueless.
She will have breached Her duty of care.
Her worth as a commercial entity will be nill.
She holds only a nominal contract with the Australian Government, in that
She is only their Patron under the title Queen of Australia.
This government can not claim any form of ownership of the land, as the
Queen of Australia is not a real person, but an entity, owns nothing and has
no Hand to sign a contract.
You will also note, that Australian money is not the lawful money of the
People guaranteed by the land of Her Majesty, but paper guaranteed by a
Queen who owns nothing - so it has no value.
What that will do to shares, money deposits, mortgages is yet to be seen.
Her Majesty gave the Australian Government two provisos concerning the
People -
1.. In 1973, that they could not use Commonwealth money to fund this
Australian research and development arm - which they did not obey.
2.. In the Australia Act 1986, that they hold a commercial contract with
any person whose ownership rights were impacted by any government activity -
they did not obey that.
Therefore, Her Majesty has been asked to remove Her patronage from this
Australian government.
The only way this government can protect itself and minimize the damage is
to force/persuade/coerce/
to a Republic, which would then mean that We, the People, had stepped away
from our protective arrangement/commercial contract with Her Majesty.
(Remember She can't do it, only we can dissolve the constitution).
OR
Fill Australia with immigrants, give them Citizenship rights and massive
financial support, to vote and wait till We, the People of the Commonwealth,
are too small in number to have any voting strength. Then vote in a Republic
and dissolve the contract.
However, that was before we knew what had been done and how.
Now it is up to each and every person in the Commonwealth to speak out and
demand the return of their rights - because under this foreign government we
have absolutely none and time will show that very clearly.
a.. If you live in Victoria and have to ask permission from at least one
council to more there, you know that already.
b.. If you live in QLD and have been taken for an involuntary mental
health check because you spoke out against the government, you know that.
c.. If you live in the coastal areas of QLD, NSW and Vic, and are having
the arbitrary wildlife corridor, run through your land, removing even your
right to walk on it, you know that.
d.. If you live in Tasmania and a world heritage listing is going to apply
to your land because you have views over a significant site, you know that.
e.. If you live in WA, and are fighting to keep government from seizing
your land for environmental purposes, you know that.
f.. If you live in SA and every high tide allows government to claim more
of your land, you know that.
g.. If you have lost your land because you chopped down some dead
tea-trees to feed starving livestock and the court costs bankrupted you, you
know that.
h.. If you lost your home to council because you owed $240 in back rates,
you know that.
i.. If you were arrested by Water Board officials who raided your land,
you know that.
j.. If a bird has priority over your ability to live on your land, you
know that.
k.. If you were not allowed to build on your land, but council took it off
you to give to developers who were given permission, you know that.
l.. If you know something is wrong with government but no government
person will listen to you, you know that.
m.. If you have been told by a politician's office staff that they decide
what letters he receives and who can see him and it won't be you, you know
that.
n.. If you did not receive any kind of justice in court, you know that.
o.. If you have been roughed up by the government's police for disagreeing
with government, you know that.
p.. If you feel powerless to understand where this country is heading, you
know that.
q.. If you have ever said, "But they can't do that..." and they did, you
know that.
r.. If you did not agree at Referendum to any structure of government that
I have described, you know that.
s.. If you voted at any Referendum and saw the resulting vote ignored, you
know that.
YOU ALL KNOW SOMETHING IS WRONG.
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT OR YOU WILL LOSE EVERYTHING.
The People of the Commonwealth do not have -
a.. Any common law protection
b.. Any Bill of Rights protection
c.. Any Human Rights protection (Amnesty International can verify that)
d.. Any security of tenure
e.. Any inheritance right
The People of the Commonwealth do not have -
a.. Any courts to protect us
b.. No police to protect us
c.. No army to protect us
d.. No lawyers or solicitors to speak for us
e.. No politicians who work for us
WHAT DOYOU THINK ABOUT THAT?
IS THAT THE LEGACY YOU WILL LEAVE FOR YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN?
ARE WE STILL CONVICTS OR ARE WE FREE MEN AND WOMEN!
KNOW WHO YOU ARE AND SPEAK OUT, LOUDLY AND WITH ALL THE AUTHORITY YOU HAVE
AS A MEMBER OF THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH.
To read the full package of information including some evidentiary documents
please go to Larry Hannigan's Australia
http://larryhannigan.com/
First it is vital to understand just who We, the People are
constitutionally.
a.. The Commonwealth is the People - not the landmass known as Australia
b.. The Commonwealth Parliament is the Parliament of the People.
c.. Common Law is the law of the People.
d.. Her Majesty, Queen Elizabeth II of Great Britain and Ireland is the
sovereign of the People.
e.. The People are Her subjects.
f.. Her Majesty owns the land mass known as Australia, in trust for the
People
g.. Her Majesty is the keeper of the Law of the People, the Law of the
Land
Therefore, all judges, police, politicians and etc can only deal with the
People in any judicial and political manner by
a.. swearing an oath to Her Majesty
which gives them Her authority to arrest or render a judgment, or make a law
which will affect the People.
Without that authority, any of those kind of actions are null and void.
That is why, in the Courts and Parliament, the representatives of Her
Majesty sit under a picture of Her or a replica of Her Royal Seal - to
signify they hold Her authority in that place and that position.
That is why all acts of Parliament dealing with all civil and political
matters of the People are sealed to Our Queen, under her Royal Seal. Because
they are part of the part of the contractual relatonship we have with Her
and Her Parliament.
Now what keeps the People to this structure of civil and political rights is
the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution (UK) 1900 inter alia Commonwealth
of Australia Constitution 1900.
This is a commercial contract,
a.. signed by the Hand of Her Majesty, Queen Victoria,
b.. sealed by Her Royal Seal (the lion and the unicorn)
c.. and delivered to the People with whom She has the contract - the
People in the Commonwealth of Australia.
This contract is NOT and has NEVER been made with any government. It was
made with Her Majesty.
Government, as such, belongs to Her Majesty, administering and protecting
Her assets.
As subjects of Her Majesty, we are the beneficiary of Her assets, however,
Government, in their dealings with the People, are bound to the People's
"rules", as found in our Constitution.
Her Majesty CAN NOT remove Herself from that contract as it is binding on
the Heirs and Successors to the throne in perpetuity.
Only the People of the Commonwealth can remove the contract.
Hence our Constitution is referred to as indissoluble - unable to be
terminated or annuled.
The People of the Commonwealth pay Her Majesty $19 million dollars per year
as part of that contract.
As Her Majesty is the owner of the landmass known as Australia any purchase
of land is a commercial contract with Her.
Government are no more or less than agents in the sale. Stamp duty until
recently accumulated in order to supply government with the funds to buy
land back when necessary. That land would then return to being Crown lands.
(For all details on what you actually own when you purchase land please go
to earlier postings on this site.)
Regardless of whether the land has been onsold since the first sale, it
remains a commercial contract with Her in its inception, construction and
constitutional authority.
This is because in every sale, She remains part of the ownership via the
registration of minerals and other such physical elements of land.
This reservation has always AND must always be noted on the Deed of Title OR
the reservation is not lawful or valid.
And in the case a person dies without any heirs to inherit, the land reverts
to Her full ownership.
The right to own land is the foundation of all ownership rights, the ability
to inherit and etc.
The money of the People is money that Her Majesty authorises as the owner of
the land, which is the collatoral. This money must carry Her face and Her
Seal to signify that authority.
Without the Authority of the owner of the land - all other forms of money in
Australia have no value.
Why has our research led us to believe all governments since 1972 have been
Foreign governments to the People?
Because in 1973, the Parliament of the Commonwealth was given permission to
form a Research & Development arm, to capitalize on the mineral elements of
the land mass of Australia.
Because Her Majesty owned that land mass, this was done with Her Majesty's
permission as the Patron of that "arm."
And just as any company or corporation must have, the government claimed for
its Seal - the Great Seal of the Commonwealth - the kangaroo and the emu -
renamed the Great Seal of Australia.
From that time on, Australia should have had a constitutional parliament of
the People under the "Commonwealth", AND a government arm dealing with the
land under "Australia".
However, please note this could only be Crown land, because Her Majesty had
sold private land out of Her government's control UNLESS, they purchase the
land back and it returned to being Crown land.
Instead, as our research shows, the Parliament from Whitlam on, gradually
absorbed the Parliament of the People of the Commonwealth, turning it into
the Australian Parliament.
Creating the massive deception that Our Parliament was still in place, even
after it had completely disappeared by 1986.
An immediate and simple proof of that is that ALL government acts, since
1973, have been sealed to the Great Seal of Australia.
What is the significance of the Seal I have been asked?
The Seal on any legal document - and all Deeds and government acts, etc are
legal instruments - reflects the structure of law under which the document
can only and must only be recognized lawfully and administered.
By that I mean, if a document is sealed to the government of Russia, it has
absolutely no relevance in Australia.
Therefore, if the People are protected under the Royal Seal of Her Majesty,
and all relevant acts, laws, etc must be sealed to that Seal to hold lawful
authority over the People - then any act sealed to the new Australian
government can have no power over the People.
Thus making the laws of the Australian government, no more or less, foreign
to the People of the Commonwealth.
This is also vital in the Courts, because after firstly reworking all the
Commonwealth court acts back under the Great Seal, making our judicial
rights subect to the Australian government's courts - the judges began to
make their Oaths, not to Her Majesty OUR Queen, but to the Queen of
Australia - their Queen.
The judges are now called "corams" meaning an unelected judge, a person
sitting as a judge, but not a judge.
Therefore making the courts liable to uphold not our Common Law, but the
civil law of commerce, as practised by this Australian System of Government.
And to doubly keep the People well away from any Common Law, the sea
boundaries were extended around Australia, both outward and inward along
each State's coastline - the landmass was now legislatively covered in
"water", thus allowing maritime law to rule in the courts as well.
Under maritime law, the captain of the ship has total lawful control, making
all judicial rules. Common Law does not exist at sea.
Now, as the People CAN onlybe arrested, punished, sentenced, etc through
Common Law UNLESS they hold a commercial contract with any government
"department" or entity - the rise of registration, licensing, certification,
etc began in this country.
Suddenly it was a crime to do anything without being given permission from
some government agency.
Prior to the Australia Act 1986, which is the constitution of this corporate
government, followed by the States entering their own individual republican
agreement in 1999, then culminating in the full-blown Corporate Government
from 2000 onwards, the governmental structure operated under a sort of dual
system, whereby the People were "allowed" to retain some rights, in order to
give the semblance that all was still well.
From 2000 onwards that is no longer the case.
It is now impossible to plead common law rights of ownership in the courts
and as more and more people have suffered the consequences without
understanding how or why - the People are forced into obeying government
legislation and conforming to the rules of this foreign government.
Our Solution
We, the People hold a commercial contract with Her Majesty in the form of
the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution (UK) 1900 inter alia with the
Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900.
And we pay Her through that contract.
She is now being asked whether We, the People still hold that contract and
will She now abide by it to protect us and return to the People a
Commonealth Parliament.
If She does not, We the People of Australia can sue Her for breach of
contract.
If She does not, She will tell every other country that holds land under
contracts with Her - including Britain, India, Jamaica, Fiji, Singapore, the
Faulklands, NZ, Canada - that those contracts are breached and therefore
valueless.
She will have breached Her duty of care.
Her worth as a commercial entity will be nill.
She holds only a nominal contract with the Australian Government, in that
She is only their Patron under the title Queen of Australia.
This government can not claim any form of ownership of the land, as the
Queen of Australia is not a real person, but an entity, owns nothing and has
no Hand to sign a contract.
You will also note, that Australian money is not the lawful money of the
People guaranteed by the land of Her Majesty, but paper guaranteed by a
Queen who owns nothing - so it has no value.
What that will do to shares, money deposits, mortgages is yet to be seen.
Her Majesty gave the Australian Government two provisos concerning the
People -
1.. In 1973, that they could not use Commonwealth money to fund this
Australian research and development arm - which they did not obey.
2.. In the Australia Act 1986, that they hold a commercial contract with
any person whose ownership rights were impacted by any government activity -
they did not obey that.
Therefore, Her Majesty has been asked to remove Her patronage from this
Australian government.
The only way this government can protect itself and minimize the damage is
to force/persuade/coerce/
to a Republic, which would then mean that We, the People, had stepped away
from our protective arrangement/commercial contract with Her Majesty.
(Remember She can't do it, only we can dissolve the constitution).
OR
Fill Australia with immigrants, give them Citizenship rights and massive
financial support, to vote and wait till We, the People of the Commonwealth,
are too small in number to have any voting strength. Then vote in a Republic
and dissolve the contract.
However, that was before we knew what had been done and how.
Now it is up to each and every person in the Commonwealth to speak out and
demand the return of their rights - because under this foreign government we
have absolutely none and time will show that very clearly.
a.. If you live in Victoria and have to ask permission from at least one
council to more there, you know that already.
b.. If you live in QLD and have been taken for an involuntary mental
health check because you spoke out against the government, you know that.
c.. If you live in the coastal areas of QLD, NSW and Vic, and are having
the arbitrary wildlife corridor, run through your land, removing even your
right to walk on it, you know that.
d.. If you live in Tasmania and a world heritage listing is going to apply
to your land because you have views over a significant site, you know that.
e.. If you live in WA, and are fighting to keep government from seizing
your land for environmental purposes, you know that.
f.. If you live in SA and every high tide allows government to claim more
of your land, you know that.
g.. If you have lost your land because you chopped down some dead
tea-trees to feed starving livestock and the court costs bankrupted you, you
know that.
h.. If you lost your home to council because you owed $240 in back rates,
you know that.
i.. If you were arrested by Water Board officials who raided your land,
you know that.
j.. If a bird has priority over your ability to live on your land, you
know that.
k.. If you were not allowed to build on your land, but council took it off
you to give to developers who were given permission, you know that.
l.. If you know something is wrong with government but no government
person will listen to you, you know that.
m.. If you have been told by a politician's office staff that they decide
what letters he receives and who can see him and it won't be you, you know
that.
n.. If you did not receive any kind of justice in court, you know that.
o.. If you have been roughed up by the government's police for disagreeing
with government, you know that.
p.. If you feel powerless to understand where this country is heading, you
know that.
q.. If you have ever said, "But they can't do that..." and they did, you
know that.
r.. If you did not agree at Referendum to any structure of government that
I have described, you know that.
s.. If you voted at any Referendum and saw the resulting vote ignored, you
know that.
YOU ALL KNOW SOMETHING IS WRONG.
DO SOMETHING ABOUT IT OR YOU WILL LOSE EVERYTHING.
The People of the Commonwealth do not have -
a.. Any common law protection
b.. Any Bill of Rights protection
c.. Any Human Rights protection (Amnesty International can verify that)
d.. Any security of tenure
e.. Any inheritance right
The People of the Commonwealth do not have -
a.. Any courts to protect us
b.. No police to protect us
c.. No army to protect us
d.. No lawyers or solicitors to speak for us
e.. No politicians who work for us
WHAT DOYOU THINK ABOUT THAT?
IS THAT THE LEGACY YOU WILL LEAVE FOR YOUR CHILDREN AND GRANDCHILDREN?
ARE WE STILL CONVICTS OR ARE WE FREE MEN AND WOMEN!
KNOW WHO YOU ARE AND SPEAK OUT, LOUDLY AND WITH ALL THE AUTHORITY YOU HAVE
AS A MEMBER OF THE PEOPLE OF THE COMMONWEALTH.
Brief Overview with regard the Previous Posting
If you want the full package of the information regarding the research that
has gone to Her Majesty and will be part of the Case in the Privy Council
please email flora@reachnet.com.au
Here is an overview of the research findings as I personally understand it.
In 1973, the Parliament of Australia used a particular Act to create a
research and development arm of the government which they call the
Australian System of Government.
This ASG removed every common law / constitutional act from its lawful
structure inside the Commonwealth government and placed them UNDER the
corporate arm, including the judiciary.
In 1999 all (without reference to the People), states agreed to a republic
inside this arm, created their own constitution for the research and trading
called the Australia Act 1986.
They then corporatized the whole of the government, every tier, and began
selling the country off.
Since 1973, the people of the country have not had a government as such,
certainly not one that answers to their rights under the Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900.
The land mass of Australia is now a business,
a.. the corporation that owns it is the Australian System of Government,
b.. the board of directors (COAG) consists of the head of each state and
the Prime Ministers,
c.. the trading element is Australian money (which has absolutely no
collatoral to back it),
d.. the sweat and labour of the people is the asset base.
This corporate structure
a.. has claimed ownership of all land in Australia, including any
privately owned land (in a particularly devious manner)
b.. borrows money using that land base from the International Monetary
Fund
c.. has made the only law in Australia civil / maritime attached to the
International Criminal Code of Rome
d.. moved the edges of the sea in order to 'cover' Australia in water for
the purposes of maritime law
The judiciary work for the corporation in their own corporate arm
a.. their practising certificates are issued by the corporation
b.. their wages are paid in Australian money
c.. they are bound to acts of treason against the prime Minister.
The People
a.. are classed in these corporate acts as 'things'
b.. are being forced to contract to this corporation
c.. are charged under the Crimes at Sea Act
d.. have their ownership rights removed under the Foreign Acquisitions
Act.
The Foreign Acquisitions Act relates is used because if the people are
"things", then they can not be heard or seen, they have no way of
complaining and they belong to a government (Commonwealth) that does not
exist in Australia at present, so this ASG is foreign to them.
How does this relate to the whole global warming issue, the ETS, the Mining
Tax, etc?
I believe that is the actual research and development area of this corporate
ASG, with the corporate decisions from that research being used to legislate
over and remove the wealth of the People and the country.
I think we have been defrauded for the last 37 years, in a progressive
theft, so that these entites, who have stolen our rights and our money, can
make off with our land as well.
Posted by flora at 12:28 AM 0 comments
Monday, August 23, 2010
Update on the matter of the Rights of the People of the Commonwealth
Since April 2010, the research we have been involved in has been completed.
We spent quite some time attempting to lodge the matter into the High Court.
However, firstly we were told we were attempting to lodge the matter on the
wrong paper, then when we changed it, that was also the wrong paper!
Then we were told we were 'apparently' not asking for anything
constitutional, so it was returned, and etc.
Just like a game.
Finally David John Walter sent Chief Justice French a letter outlining the
situation as we saw it in Australia, asking for him to intervene in a
constitutional manner as a person of gender in the High Court of Australia.
In a letter written and sent by the Registrar of the High Court, we were
told we could not correspond with the Chief Justice and that our matter held
no jurisdiction in that court.
That was all we needed.
How could a constitutional, common law matter hold no jurisdiction in the
High Court unless the High Court no longer acted in that area?
Unless the High Court no longer acted for the People of the Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900.
That matter has now been given to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, the
protector of the People through our Constitution and the holder of the
common law, to read.
We are now preparing to go to the Privy Council to recover the civil and
political rights of the People and to recover the protection for their
private rights of ownership.
We are in the process of placing all relevant documentation on a website and
I will publish that link as soon as possible.
If you wish to have the package of information immediately please contact
flora@reachnet.com.au and they will be sent as a PDF document.
Posted by flora at 10:49 PM 0 comments
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
A Prayer for the People of the Commonwealth
110 years ago, our forefathers entered into a Covenant relationship with God
through His regent Queen Victoria, when they created the Preamble to the
Commonwealth Constitution.
In that Preamble, they forever stated that they "humbly relied on the
blessings of Almighty God."
That Preamble is where the People reside as People of the Commonwealth and
at this time in our lives and our history we need His blessings more than
ever.
I offer this prayer to the People.
Almighty God, I acknowledge that relationship my forefathers entered into
with You and I can see that Your blessings were mighty over this country,
protecting it from many of the horrors that other people have lived through
in other parts of this world.
And Lord, I acknowledge that we the People have become complacent and
rebellious, turning from that blessing and following our own paths, even
forgetting who created that blessing.
For that, I am personally sorry.
Humbly I ask, as a member of the People of the Commonwealth freely accepting
that covenant relationship, that You continue to pour out Your blessings.
I ask, in this time when the People have no apparent judicial protection,
that You become our Justice and our Judge in all things to do with the
People of the Commonwealth.
When You see deception, manipulation and lies being used to remove the
People from their covenant, constitutional & Royal protection, I ask that
You stand between the People and those who would harm us, and render
Judgment.
When You see theft being used to remove any and/or all the rights of the
People, I ask that You stand between the People and those who would commit
this crime against us, and render Judgment.
And when You see any attempts to enslave the People, removing them from
their covenant relationship with You, removing them from that awesome
freedom, I ask that Your Judgment be swift and decisive.
I ask, in this time when the People are bewildered, unable to clearly see
where the Truth stands, that You place discernment, wisdom and clear
direction into the hearts and minds of the People of the Commonwealth.
Finally I ask, in this time when the People are fearful and lacking in
courage, that You give us a measure of Your power, a Measure of Your
Fearlessness and a measure of Your Might.
And, as I can only speak for myself, I promise to use those gifts with Faith
and Trust.
I ask in the name of Jesus Christ.
So be it.
Amen.
Posted by flora at 2:55 PM 2 comments
Notes from the Sydney Cooee Rally - 24 Feb 2010
What is happening in Australia? The People know that legislation is removing
their rights, taking their assets and endangering their mental safety. The
People know men and women who are fighting parts of the problem, such as
Peter Spencer, but the question we must ask is how have government been able
to do this without the permission of the People?
This is a simple overview of our findings -
1. Prior to the formation of the Federation, all colonies but SA were
independent penal colonies, under the authority of the British Empire.
2. For purposes of trade, these colonies operated under the 1855 Federal
Council of Australasia.
3. The planning for a Federation took 10 years of conventions and
referendums.
4. The draft Constitution was formed and sent to England.
5. On 9 July 1900, Queen Victoria signed the amended Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900 and returned it to Australia.
6. This constitution required a final referendum of the People to approve
it. Why?
7. Because it was a contract between the owner of the land, the Queen’s most
Excellent Majesty, and her loyal subjects under the Seal of the Crown of the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. And any contract must have the
full agreement of both parties.
8. The details of this contract were that she and her heirs would protect
us, we would pay into her consolidated revenue our taxes, she would then pay
the public servants wages, and the public servants would obey our
Constitution in their administration of her lands on our behalf.
9. Who are we in this Act? We are the Commonwealth. The actual Constitution
at part 9 is the rules applicable to government.
10. And it states at part 9, section 117 and section 128 of the Commonwealth
of Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900, that government can not remove our
rights without our permission.
11. Unfortunately, for reasons of state, the heads of those independent
colonies decided not to have another referendum, but instead agreed to this
contract “for and on behalf” of the People. Creating the first loophole in
Federation.
12. In 1973, Gough Edward Whitlam came into power and immediately created
the Queen of Australia and the Great Seal of Australia.
13. From the time on all government legislation has been created under that
Queen and sealed to the Seal. What does this mean?
14. The Queen of the People of the Commonwealth is Her Majesty Queen
Elizabeth of Great Britain and Ireland – not the Queen of Australia. The
Queen of Australia is an entity completely unknown to our rights. She did
not sell us her land, she does not quarantee our protection.
15. The Seal of the People of the Commonwealth is the Royal Seal of Great
Britain with the lion and the unicorn. The Great Seal of Australia with the
kangaroo and the emu, is a seal completely foreign to our laws under our
Constitution and our rights.
16. A Queen and a Seal are not just pretty pictures on a page, they are
profound legal elements telling anyone who understands them and must operate
under them, what laws, what government, what power they must obey.
17. Anyone who has been taken to court under these draconian laws should
know that the first thing a judge must do is look at the Seal on the charge.
If it is the Royal Seal he must rule under common law. If it is the Great
Seal he must rule under the legislation of the Aust government. If it is the
state Seal he must rule under state legislation. And he can not look at any
other legislation in his decision. He is bound to the Seal and your rights
are completely ignored.
18. Our rights are found under the Royal Seal, at common law and equity, as
found in the judicial system created in the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act (UK) 1900 and protected by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
of Great Britain and Ireland.
19. Our rights are not found in the courts of Australia which are bound to
these government creations – hence – we lose.
20. In essence, what Gough Whitlam created in 1973, was a republic in all
but name.
21. The progressive removal of our Queen and our Seal from all legislation
in Australia now sees the sovereign power vested solely in the Prime
Minister, who has never been given that right by the People.
22. Under that sovereignty we have been made their commercial chattel, we
provide them with our money/our taxes, we must obey their laws on political
grounds, we are taken into their courts by their employees and tried in
their system under statutory law, where, under the Criminal Code 1995, a
person is defined as being a ‘nothing” and an act of treason can only be
committed against a Prime Minister..
23. This is not our government. This government is completely foreign to our
1900 (UK) Commmonwealth Constitution.
24. In this foreign government all dealings are now contractural under the
corporate structure.
25. Our government was authorised by Queen Victoria to operate under common
law and equity, and their permission stopped at making laws for Peace,
Welfare and Good Government only.
26. What have they done with our Constitution? They have placed it inside a
consolidated act referred to simply as The Constitution. Inside that act is
the Australia Act 1986 (their constitution), the Westminster Act and our
Constitution – all Sealed under the Great Seal of Australia.
27. In simple words, under their control. We have been enslaved.
28. The states have all returned to their independent colonial status,
reworking those 1800’s constitutions back into modern terms.
29. COAG is now the trade agreement between all government entities
including local councils. You do not get to vote who sits in COAG, yet all
agreements over your land rights are under the power of COAG.
30. People of the Commonwealth, they have removed our civil and political
rights – did you agree to that?
31. People of the Commonwealth, they have removed your private ownership
rights to your wealth, your land, your goods and your chattels. Did you
agree to that?
32. People of the Commonwealth, they have created a ‘republican style’
government and removed our Constitutional Monarchy. Did you agree to that?
33. Her Majesty did not give this foreign government permission to steal her
land and she has recently re-affirmed her role as the protector of the
People when she stated she was the Head of State in this country.
34. And you must understand, we are the People of the State of the
Commonwealth, so she was telling this government that she is now stepping
into the battle to protect us.
35. People of the Commonwealth, this foreign government has taken the assets
of Her Majesty, kept in trust for her People, they have sold those assets
and pocketed the money. Did you agree to that?
36. This foreign government rules with fear and statute law.
37. They are nothing but thieves – do not allow them to force us to live in
fear. We are much, much greater than that.
38. If you do not know who you are and what you own, you will not know what
is being stolen from you.
39. Stand united, know who you are, where your protection lies and speak
out. Make your voices roar through the offices and halls of their corporate
headquarters. Let them know the People of the Commonwealth have had enough!
Posted by flora at 2:48 PM 0 comments
Labels: Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Great Seal of Australia,
Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Australia, Royal Seal
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
My Will - Appendix
APPENDIX I
(A) Magna Carta 1215.
(39) No freeman shall be captured or imprisoned or disseised or outlawed or
exiled or in any way destroyed, nor will we go against him or send against
him, except by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the land.
(40) To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay right or
justice.
(
Extract from the Statute issued by Edward I, in confirmation of the
Charters, November 5, 1297.
"...and that our justices, sheriffs and mayors, and other ministers, which,
under us, have the laws of our land to guide, shall allow the said charters,
pleaded before them in judgement, in all their points, that is to wit, the
Great Charter as the common law."
(C) Bill Of Rights 1689.
(5) That it is the right of the subjects to Petition the King, and all
Commitments and Prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal.
(D) Crimes Act 1914.
(24F) Nothing in the preceding provisions of this Part makes it unlawful for
a person:-
(a) to endeavour in good faith to show that the Sovereign, the
Governor-General, the Governor of a State, the Administrator of a Territory,
or the advisors of any of them, or the persons responsible for the
government of another country, has or have been, or is or are, mistaken in
any of his or their counsels, policies or actions;
(F) Postage exemptions for material sent to the Governor-General and the
State Governors:-
Information from the stamp below must be printed or written on the top left
corner of envelope to the Governor-General or State Governors. All
information abbreviated as given on stamp must appear on the envelope:
EXEMPT POSTAGE
Post. Serv. Act. 1975
Part III; Div. 1. Sec. 14(5a).
Posted by flora at 6:05 PM 0 comments
Labels: Bill of Rights 1689, Crimes Act 1914, Governor-General, Magna Carta,
My Will, State Governors
My Will - Part 8
FEW THOUGHTS ON EXTRA CONSTITUTIONAL SAFEGUARDS FOR THE PEOPLE
In the previous Chapters the Constitutional and legal powers available to
the people to get what they want, and to protect themselves against the
manipulators of party politics, have been outlined.
The question now arises whether additional Constitutional safeguards are
required to further protect the people. In this chapter a few thoughts are
advanced.
Clearly, whilst the Commonwealth and State Constitutions give the people the
power to have their Lower Houses of Parliament dissolved at any time of the
people's choosing, there is presently no authority:-
(a) For the Upper Houses to be sent back to face the electors when they so
WILL it.
(b) For any Senator or Legislative Councillor to be forced to face
reelection at any time the electors so WILL it.
(c) For any electorate to have its existing Member, Federal or State, sent
back to re-contest his seat if a majority of his electors so WILL it.
The inclusion of all three above powers in both Commonwealth and State
Constitutions are essential to give the electors even more effective control
over their parliamentarians and the machinery of Parliament, and make both
more sensitive to the requirements of the people.
To bring any Senator, Legislative Councillor or Member back to face a
re-contesting of his seat ought only to require a simple majority of
electors in each of the three constitutional areas to inform the
Govenor-General or State Governor - which ever is appropriate - that it is
MY WILL that "so and so be sent back to recontest his seat in his House of
Parliament."
It may be contended that such a constitutional provision would make the
Houses of Parliament unworkable because the actions of opposing groups would
involve Members and Senators in continuous elections. Such a contention,
however, misses the point that electors would not be interested in recalling
a Member or Senator who was giving public evidence of faithfully performing
his judicially defined legal function and duty. Naturally legal safeguards
would have to be included in the Constitutions making it illegal, even an
act of conspiracy, for any recall of a Senator or Member to be initiated,
organised and or financed from outside the electorate concerned.
In this work it is not intended to go into the question of the actual
machinery necessary to allow the electors to replace any Member or Senator
whom they have recalled. Rather it is the purpose to raise the point for
serious study by the electors themselves as to how they may determine what
basic protection changes they want in their Constitutions. Undoubtedly there
would be many competent persons who could work out the machinery necessary
to give full and proper legal effect to the WILL of the electors in this
matter.
Another extremely vital protection element for the people is that no
treaties, international conventions or agreements, and the like, should be
entered into by Parliament, or by executive action, without the specific
consent and authority of the people themselves. This point is raised because
such things are agreed to, far too often, without the people having the
faintest idea of the direct and indirect legal and other significances and
consequences of such actions.
Indeed, few would be the politicians, let alone the people, who would have
any conception of the far reaching effects that many such Treaties,
agreements and conventions could have upon Australia and the Australian way
of life. Under the influence, if not the manipulations, of international
interests, theorists and idealists, Ministers of the Crown far too often
persuade the legal government and the Houses of Parliament (under party
control) to agree to bind the nation and States without the full
implications of the legal, political and economic impacts being first
thoroughly publicly debated.
Even at this moment of writing there are agreements and conventions afoot of
which, in Australia, few indeed have any real knowledge; agreements and
conventions that can have far greater impact upon the liberty and way of
life in this country than some Ministers would care to fully explain.
The people should also insist that the Commonwealth and State Constitutions
be tightened to make it absolutely impossible for Ministers of the Crown and
Houses of Parliament to effect, what some would call, snide changes in the
Constitutions without a referendum of the people. Those who have made long
and deep researches into constitutional law are aware how these changes can
be affected without the real understanding of the people and most
politicians.
It cannot be denied that this country is suffering from "government by
regulation" and many writers have drawn attention to this indisputable fact.
In Commonwealth and State Parliaments the volume of legislation which is
implimented by subsequent departmental regulations is quite unbelievable.
Even during the last War, the noted N.S.W. constitutional authority, Dr.
Frank Louatt, K.C., was moved to direct attention to the fact that for every
1000 pages of Acts of Parliaments there were over 5000 pages of regulations.
In their own interests the people should forbid the passing of any
legislation which requires departmental regulations to impliment it. If
regulations are thought to be required then the parliamentarians, party
pressures notwithstanding, must be adamant that the departmental officers
seeking those regulations shall be brought before the bar of the House of
Parliament and made to publicly prove that such regulation is absolutely
vital in the interests of the people.
This Chapter advances but a few thoughts: a few of the many arising from
many long years of Constitutional research, coupled with both parliamentary
and departmental personal experience. They are offered to stimulate deeper
thought and study by the reader of this book.
It has been said of the great Henry Ford_of the "tin lizzy" fame_ that he
once stated:-
"It matters not how many degrees you may have after your name, unless you
can think, you are uneducated."
The writer hopes that the contents of this book will make you
THINK!
AND THEN ACT.
"BUT THEY SHALL SIT EVERY MAN UNDER HIS VINE AND UNDER HIS FIG TREE; AND
NONE SHALL MAKE THEM AFRAID;...."
MICAH I V, iv.
Posted by flora at 6:02 PM 0 comments
Labels: crown, Minister of the Crown, My Will, Parliament, People of the
Commonwealth
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
About Me
Sue Maynes
Researching private land ownership, the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution (UK) 1900 and those who would be our masters and remove our
sovereignty.
View my complete profile
Search This Blog
powered by
Links
a.. Oz Central - The World
b.. Larry Hannigan's Australia
Subscribe To
Posts
Atom
Posts
All Comments
Atom
All Comments
Blog Archive
a.. ? 2009 (31)
a.. ? December (31)
a.. Civil Law
b.. Comparison of Common Law v Civil Law
c.. Colour of Law v Black Letter Law
d.. The Colour of Law in Australia
e.. Pt 1. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
f.. Pt 2. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
g.. Pt 3. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
h.. Pt 4. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
i.. Pt 5. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
j.. Pt 6. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
k.. Pt 7. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
l.. Pt 8. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
m.. Queensland Has 3 Constitutions
n.. Who Makes the Rules In & For Queensland?
o.. Brigalow Corporation
p.. Are Australians Already Enslaved?
q.. The Superiority of private Land Ownership Rights
r.. The Executive Government of Australia in 2009
s.. State Governments of Australia in 2009
t.. Courts of Australia in 2009
a.. ? 2010 (30)
a.. ? January (14)
a.. Index of December 2009 Research Information
b.. Background to the Commonwealth of Australia Consti...
c.. An Overview of The Commonwealth of Australia Const...
d.. Government Creation of a new Constitution
e.. WA and QLD and the 1900 Constitution
f.. COAG, Corporations and the New Government
g.. People of the Commonwealth
h.. Doubts About the Validity of the Constitution of t...
i.. Demand Request for Anna Bligh, Premier of QLD
j.. Reply from Anna Bligh, Premier of QLD
k.. QLD Public Letters of Support to the High Court
l.. Commonwealth Public Letters of Support to the High...
m.. An Overview of the Brigalow Corp Takeover of Austr...
n.. You tube videos on Queensland & its Constitution
a.. ? February (13)
a.. Index of December Research Information
b.. Index of January 2010 Research Information
c.. My Will - Part 1
d.. My Will - Part 2
e.. My Will - Part 3
f.. My Will - Part 4
g.. My Will - Part 5
h.. My Will - Part 6
i.. My Will - Part 7
j.. My Will - Part 8
k.. My Will - Appendix
l.. Notes from the Sydney Cooee Rally - 24 Feb 2010
m.. A Prayer for the People of the Commonwealth
a.. ? August (2)
a.. Update on the matter of the Rights of the People o...
b.. Brief Overview with regard the Previous Posting
a.. ? September (1)
a.. Why This Corporate Government is Not Our Governmen...
Important
a.. Bill of Rights 1689
b.. Environment Protections & Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
c.. Habeus Corpus Act 1679
d.. Magna Carta 1215
e.. The Global Biodiversity Assessment Report
Australia
a.. Chapter III Courts
b.. Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900
c.. Details of Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900
d.. Referendums in Australia
e.. Separation of Powers
High Court Cases
a.. Commonwealth v NSW 1923
b.. George v Rockett 1990
c.. Halliday v Nevill 1984
d.. Hillpalm P/L v Heaven's Door P/L 2004
e.. Kuru v NSW 2008
f.. Lapin v Abigail 1930
g.. NSW v Ibbett 2006
h.. Pirie v Registrar-General 1962
i.. Plenty v Dillon 1991
j.. Sue v Hill 1999
NWO Sites
a.. Takeover of the World
Labels
a.. absolute taking (1)
b.. Admiralty Law (2)
c.. alienation (1)
d.. Anna Bligh (4)
e.. Arthur Chresby (2)
f.. Australia Act 1986 (4)
g.. Balfour Declaration 1926 (1)
h.. Bill of Rights 1689 (4)
i.. Bills (2)
j.. birth certificates (1)
k.. Black Letter law (1)
l.. Bob Hawke (1)
m.. Bone v Mothershaw (1)
n.. Brigalow Corporation (7)
o.. Chapter III Court (1)
p.. Christian monarchy (1)
q.. citizens (1)
r.. civil law (5)
s.. COAG (2)
t.. colour of law (2)
u.. common law (11)
v.. Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (17)
w.. communities (1)
x.. compensation (1)
y.. contract (2)
z.. corporate governments (1)
aa.. corporeal hereditaments (1)
ab.. courts (2)
ac.. covenant (1)
ad.. Crimes Act 1914 (1)
ae.. Criminal code (1)
af.. crown (7)
ag.. de jure (1)
ah.. deception (1)
ai.. Deed of Grant in Fee Simple (2)
aj.. deeds (2)
ak.. defact (1)
al.. democracy (2)
am.. draft constitution (1)
an.. elections (4)
ao.. England (1)
ap.. entities (1)
aq.. environment (1)
ar.. Executive (1)
as.. executive government (3)
at.. Fabian Society (1)
au.. Federal Council of Australasia (2)
av.. Fee Simple (6)
aw.. free and common socage (1)
ax.. free man and women (1)
ay.. freehold (1)
az.. Gough Whitlam (1)
ba.. Governor in Council (2)
bb.. governor of QLD (2)
bc.. Governor-General (9)
bd.. Great Seal of Australia (3)
be.. Habeus Corpus (2)
bf.. high court rulings (6)
bg.. House of Representatives (1)
bh.. human rights (1)
bi.. income tax (2)
bj.. incorporeal hereditaments (1)
bk.. individual (1)
bl.. Inheritable Estate (1)
bm.. instrument (1)
bn.. John Lilburne (1)
bo.. Judiciary (1)
bp.. jurisdiction (1)
bq.. land ownership (3)
br.. Land Tenures (3)
bs.. legislation (2)
bt.. Legislative Assembly (1)
bu.. licence and fine (1)
bv.. Lipohar v The Queen (2)
bw.. Local councils (1)
bx.. Mabo and Ano v the State of QLD (2)
by.. Magna Carta (4)
bz.. maritime law (1)
ca.. Marxism (1)
cb.. messuages (1)
cc.. Minister of the Crown (4)
cd.. My Will (9)
ce.. Newcrest Mining Ltd v The Commonwealth of Australia (1)
cf.. no entry (1)
cg.. Parliament (1)
ch.. Parliament of QLD (3)
ci.. Parliamentarian (3)
cj.. Parliamentary Secretary (1)
ck.. People of the Commonwealth (3)
cl.. permission (2)
cm.. person (2)
cn.. political party (2)
co.. Preamble (1)
cp.. premier (4)
cq.. Prime Minister (2)
cr.. private land (1)
cs.. public officials (1)
ct.. QLD Constitution 1867 (5)
cu.. QLD Constitution 2001 (10)
cv.. QLD Corporation (1)
cw.. QLD Treasury Corporation (1)
cx.. Queen (2)
cy.. Queen Elizabeth II (3)
cz.. Queen of Australia (2)
da.. Queen Victoria (1)
db.. Queensland (2)
dc.. Quen Elizabeth II (1)
dd.. reasonable belief (1)
de.. referendum (6)
df.. Registrar-General (1)
dg.. registration (1)
dh.. republic (2)
di.. rights (3)
dj.. roman law (1)
dk.. Royal and Parliamentary Titles Act 1927 (1)
dl.. Royal Seal (2)
dm.. scutage (1)
dn.. Senate (2)
do.. Separation of Powers (2)
dp.. Sir John Kerr (1)
dq.. socialist law (1)
dr.. sovereign (1)
ds.. sovereign people (5)
dt.. Speaker of the House (1)
du.. Star Chamber (1)
dv.. State Constitutions (1)
dw.. State Governors (2)
dx.. statutory instruments (1)
dy.. Supreme Court (1)
dz.. tenant in common (1)
ea.. tenements (1)
eb.. tenure (1)
ec.. the States (2)
ed.. Torrens Title (2)
ee.. trespass (2)
ef.. trial (1)
eg.. WA (1)
eh.. Westminster System (2)
ei.. William Blackstone (1)
ej.. Your Will Be Done (5)
If you want the full package of the information regarding the research that
has gone to Her Majesty and will be part of the Case in the Privy Council
please email flora@reachnet.com.au
Here is an overview of the research findings as I personally understand it.
In 1973, the Parliament of Australia used a particular Act to create a
research and development arm of the government which they call the
Australian System of Government.
This ASG removed every common law / constitutional act from its lawful
structure inside the Commonwealth government and placed them UNDER the
corporate arm, including the judiciary.
In 1999 all (without reference to the People), states agreed to a republic
inside this arm, created their own constitution for the research and trading
called the Australia Act 1986.
They then corporatized the whole of the government, every tier, and began
selling the country off.
Since 1973, the people of the country have not had a government as such,
certainly not one that answers to their rights under the Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900.
The land mass of Australia is now a business,
a.. the corporation that owns it is the Australian System of Government,
b.. the board of directors (COAG) consists of the head of each state and
the Prime Ministers,
c.. the trading element is Australian money (which has absolutely no
collatoral to back it),
d.. the sweat and labour of the people is the asset base.
This corporate structure
a.. has claimed ownership of all land in Australia, including any
privately owned land (in a particularly devious manner)
b.. borrows money using that land base from the International Monetary
Fund
c.. has made the only law in Australia civil / maritime attached to the
International Criminal Code of Rome
d.. moved the edges of the sea in order to 'cover' Australia in water for
the purposes of maritime law
The judiciary work for the corporation in their own corporate arm
a.. their practising certificates are issued by the corporation
b.. their wages are paid in Australian money
c.. they are bound to acts of treason against the prime Minister.
The People
a.. are classed in these corporate acts as 'things'
b.. are being forced to contract to this corporation
c.. are charged under the Crimes at Sea Act
d.. have their ownership rights removed under the Foreign Acquisitions
Act.
The Foreign Acquisitions Act relates is used because if the people are
"things", then they can not be heard or seen, they have no way of
complaining and they belong to a government (Commonwealth) that does not
exist in Australia at present, so this ASG is foreign to them.
How does this relate to the whole global warming issue, the ETS, the Mining
Tax, etc?
I believe that is the actual research and development area of this corporate
ASG, with the corporate decisions from that research being used to legislate
over and remove the wealth of the People and the country.
I think we have been defrauded for the last 37 years, in a progressive
theft, so that these entites, who have stolen our rights and our money, can
make off with our land as well.
Posted by flora at 12:28 AM 0 comments
Monday, August 23, 2010
Update on the matter of the Rights of the People of the Commonwealth
Since April 2010, the research we have been involved in has been completed.
We spent quite some time attempting to lodge the matter into the High Court.
However, firstly we were told we were attempting to lodge the matter on the
wrong paper, then when we changed it, that was also the wrong paper!
Then we were told we were 'apparently' not asking for anything
constitutional, so it was returned, and etc.
Just like a game.
Finally David John Walter sent Chief Justice French a letter outlining the
situation as we saw it in Australia, asking for him to intervene in a
constitutional manner as a person of gender in the High Court of Australia.
In a letter written and sent by the Registrar of the High Court, we were
told we could not correspond with the Chief Justice and that our matter held
no jurisdiction in that court.
That was all we needed.
How could a constitutional, common law matter hold no jurisdiction in the
High Court unless the High Court no longer acted in that area?
Unless the High Court no longer acted for the People of the Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900.
That matter has now been given to Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, the
protector of the People through our Constitution and the holder of the
common law, to read.
We are now preparing to go to the Privy Council to recover the civil and
political rights of the People and to recover the protection for their
private rights of ownership.
We are in the process of placing all relevant documentation on a website and
I will publish that link as soon as possible.
If you wish to have the package of information immediately please contact
flora@reachnet.com.au and they will be sent as a PDF document.
Posted by flora at 10:49 PM 0 comments
Wednesday, February 24, 2010
A Prayer for the People of the Commonwealth
110 years ago, our forefathers entered into a Covenant relationship with God
through His regent Queen Victoria, when they created the Preamble to the
Commonwealth Constitution.
In that Preamble, they forever stated that they "humbly relied on the
blessings of Almighty God."
That Preamble is where the People reside as People of the Commonwealth and
at this time in our lives and our history we need His blessings more than
ever.
I offer this prayer to the People.
Almighty God, I acknowledge that relationship my forefathers entered into
with You and I can see that Your blessings were mighty over this country,
protecting it from many of the horrors that other people have lived through
in other parts of this world.
And Lord, I acknowledge that we the People have become complacent and
rebellious, turning from that blessing and following our own paths, even
forgetting who created that blessing.
For that, I am personally sorry.
Humbly I ask, as a member of the People of the Commonwealth freely accepting
that covenant relationship, that You continue to pour out Your blessings.
I ask, in this time when the People have no apparent judicial protection,
that You become our Justice and our Judge in all things to do with the
People of the Commonwealth.
When You see deception, manipulation and lies being used to remove the
People from their covenant, constitutional & Royal protection, I ask that
You stand between the People and those who would harm us, and render
Judgment.
When You see theft being used to remove any and/or all the rights of the
People, I ask that You stand between the People and those who would commit
this crime against us, and render Judgment.
And when You see any attempts to enslave the People, removing them from
their covenant relationship with You, removing them from that awesome
freedom, I ask that Your Judgment be swift and decisive.
I ask, in this time when the People are bewildered, unable to clearly see
where the Truth stands, that You place discernment, wisdom and clear
direction into the hearts and minds of the People of the Commonwealth.
Finally I ask, in this time when the People are fearful and lacking in
courage, that You give us a measure of Your power, a Measure of Your
Fearlessness and a measure of Your Might.
And, as I can only speak for myself, I promise to use those gifts with Faith
and Trust.
I ask in the name of Jesus Christ.
So be it.
Amen.
Posted by flora at 2:55 PM 2 comments
Notes from the Sydney Cooee Rally - 24 Feb 2010
What is happening in Australia? The People know that legislation is removing
their rights, taking their assets and endangering their mental safety. The
People know men and women who are fighting parts of the problem, such as
Peter Spencer, but the question we must ask is how have government been able
to do this without the permission of the People?
This is a simple overview of our findings -
1. Prior to the formation of the Federation, all colonies but SA were
independent penal colonies, under the authority of the British Empire.
2. For purposes of trade, these colonies operated under the 1855 Federal
Council of Australasia.
3. The planning for a Federation took 10 years of conventions and
referendums.
4. The draft Constitution was formed and sent to England.
5. On 9 July 1900, Queen Victoria signed the amended Commonwealth of
Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900 and returned it to Australia.
6. This constitution required a final referendum of the People to approve
it. Why?
7. Because it was a contract between the owner of the land, the Queen’s most
Excellent Majesty, and her loyal subjects under the Seal of the Crown of the
United Kingdom of Great Britain and Ireland. And any contract must have the
full agreement of both parties.
8. The details of this contract were that she and her heirs would protect
us, we would pay into her consolidated revenue our taxes, she would then pay
the public servants wages, and the public servants would obey our
Constitution in their administration of her lands on our behalf.
9. Who are we in this Act? We are the Commonwealth. The actual Constitution
at part 9 is the rules applicable to government.
10. And it states at part 9, section 117 and section 128 of the Commonwealth
of Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900, that government can not remove our
rights without our permission.
11. Unfortunately, for reasons of state, the heads of those independent
colonies decided not to have another referendum, but instead agreed to this
contract “for and on behalf” of the People. Creating the first loophole in
Federation.
12. In 1973, Gough Edward Whitlam came into power and immediately created
the Queen of Australia and the Great Seal of Australia.
13. From the time on all government legislation has been created under that
Queen and sealed to the Seal. What does this mean?
14. The Queen of the People of the Commonwealth is Her Majesty Queen
Elizabeth of Great Britain and Ireland – not the Queen of Australia. The
Queen of Australia is an entity completely unknown to our rights. She did
not sell us her land, she does not quarantee our protection.
15. The Seal of the People of the Commonwealth is the Royal Seal of Great
Britain with the lion and the unicorn. The Great Seal of Australia with the
kangaroo and the emu, is a seal completely foreign to our laws under our
Constitution and our rights.
16. A Queen and a Seal are not just pretty pictures on a page, they are
profound legal elements telling anyone who understands them and must operate
under them, what laws, what government, what power they must obey.
17. Anyone who has been taken to court under these draconian laws should
know that the first thing a judge must do is look at the Seal on the charge.
If it is the Royal Seal he must rule under common law. If it is the Great
Seal he must rule under the legislation of the Aust government. If it is the
state Seal he must rule under state legislation. And he can not look at any
other legislation in his decision. He is bound to the Seal and your rights
are completely ignored.
18. Our rights are found under the Royal Seal, at common law and equity, as
found in the judicial system created in the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution Act (UK) 1900 and protected by Her Majesty Queen Elizabeth II
of Great Britain and Ireland.
19. Our rights are not found in the courts of Australia which are bound to
these government creations – hence – we lose.
20. In essence, what Gough Whitlam created in 1973, was a republic in all
but name.
21. The progressive removal of our Queen and our Seal from all legislation
in Australia now sees the sovereign power vested solely in the Prime
Minister, who has never been given that right by the People.
22. Under that sovereignty we have been made their commercial chattel, we
provide them with our money/our taxes, we must obey their laws on political
grounds, we are taken into their courts by their employees and tried in
their system under statutory law, where, under the Criminal Code 1995, a
person is defined as being a ‘nothing” and an act of treason can only be
committed against a Prime Minister..
23. This is not our government. This government is completely foreign to our
1900 (UK) Commmonwealth Constitution.
24. In this foreign government all dealings are now contractural under the
corporate structure.
25. Our government was authorised by Queen Victoria to operate under common
law and equity, and their permission stopped at making laws for Peace,
Welfare and Good Government only.
26. What have they done with our Constitution? They have placed it inside a
consolidated act referred to simply as The Constitution. Inside that act is
the Australia Act 1986 (their constitution), the Westminster Act and our
Constitution – all Sealed under the Great Seal of Australia.
27. In simple words, under their control. We have been enslaved.
28. The states have all returned to their independent colonial status,
reworking those 1800’s constitutions back into modern terms.
29. COAG is now the trade agreement between all government entities
including local councils. You do not get to vote who sits in COAG, yet all
agreements over your land rights are under the power of COAG.
30. People of the Commonwealth, they have removed our civil and political
rights – did you agree to that?
31. People of the Commonwealth, they have removed your private ownership
rights to your wealth, your land, your goods and your chattels. Did you
agree to that?
32. People of the Commonwealth, they have created a ‘republican style’
government and removed our Constitutional Monarchy. Did you agree to that?
33. Her Majesty did not give this foreign government permission to steal her
land and she has recently re-affirmed her role as the protector of the
People when she stated she was the Head of State in this country.
34. And you must understand, we are the People of the State of the
Commonwealth, so she was telling this government that she is now stepping
into the battle to protect us.
35. People of the Commonwealth, this foreign government has taken the assets
of Her Majesty, kept in trust for her People, they have sold those assets
and pocketed the money. Did you agree to that?
36. This foreign government rules with fear and statute law.
37. They are nothing but thieves – do not allow them to force us to live in
fear. We are much, much greater than that.
38. If you do not know who you are and what you own, you will not know what
is being stolen from you.
39. Stand united, know who you are, where your protection lies and speak
out. Make your voices roar through the offices and halls of their corporate
headquarters. Let them know the People of the Commonwealth have had enough!
Posted by flora at 2:48 PM 0 comments
Labels: Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act, Great Seal of Australia,
Queen Elizabeth II, Queen of Australia, Royal Seal
Wednesday, February 10, 2010
My Will - Appendix
APPENDIX I
(A) Magna Carta 1215.
(39) No freeman shall be captured or imprisoned or disseised or outlawed or
exiled or in any way destroyed, nor will we go against him or send against
him, except by the lawful judgement of his peers or by the law of the land.
(40) To no one will we sell, to no one will we deny or delay right or
justice.
(
Charters, November 5, 1297.
"...and that our justices, sheriffs and mayors, and other ministers, which,
under us, have the laws of our land to guide, shall allow the said charters,
pleaded before them in judgement, in all their points, that is to wit, the
Great Charter as the common law."
(C) Bill Of Rights 1689.
(5) That it is the right of the subjects to Petition the King, and all
Commitments and Prosecutions for such petitioning are illegal.
(D) Crimes Act 1914.
(24F) Nothing in the preceding provisions of this Part makes it unlawful for
a person:-
(a) to endeavour in good faith to show that the Sovereign, the
Governor-General, the Governor of a State, the Administrator of a Territory,
or the advisors of any of them, or the persons responsible for the
government of another country, has or have been, or is or are, mistaken in
any of his or their counsels, policies or actions;
(F) Postage exemptions for material sent to the Governor-General and the
State Governors:-
Information from the stamp below must be printed or written on the top left
corner of envelope to the Governor-General or State Governors. All
information abbreviated as given on stamp must appear on the envelope:
EXEMPT POSTAGE
Post. Serv. Act. 1975
Part III; Div. 1. Sec. 14(5a).
Posted by flora at 6:05 PM 0 comments
Labels: Bill of Rights 1689, Crimes Act 1914, Governor-General, Magna Carta,
My Will, State Governors
My Will - Part 8
In the previous Chapters the Constitutional and legal powers available to
the people to get what they want, and to protect themselves against the
manipulators of party politics, have been outlined.
The question now arises whether additional Constitutional safeguards are
required to further protect the people. In this chapter a few thoughts are
advanced.
Clearly, whilst the Commonwealth and State Constitutions give the people the
power to have their Lower Houses of Parliament dissolved at any time of the
people's choosing, there is presently no authority:-
(a) For the Upper Houses to be sent back to face the electors when they so
WILL it.
(b) For any Senator or Legislative Councillor to be forced to face
reelection at any time the electors so WILL it.
(c) For any electorate to have its existing Member, Federal or State, sent
back to re-contest his seat if a majority of his electors so WILL it.
The inclusion of all three above powers in both Commonwealth and State
Constitutions are essential to give the electors even more effective control
over their parliamentarians and the machinery of Parliament, and make both
more sensitive to the requirements of the people.
To bring any Senator, Legislative Councillor or Member back to face a
re-contesting of his seat ought only to require a simple majority of
electors in each of the three constitutional areas to inform the
Govenor-General or State Governor - which ever is appropriate - that it is
MY WILL that "so and so be sent back to recontest his seat in his House of
Parliament."
It may be contended that such a constitutional provision would make the
Houses of Parliament unworkable because the actions of opposing groups would
involve Members and Senators in continuous elections. Such a contention,
however, misses the point that electors would not be interested in recalling
a Member or Senator who was giving public evidence of faithfully performing
his judicially defined legal function and duty. Naturally legal safeguards
would have to be included in the Constitutions making it illegal, even an
act of conspiracy, for any recall of a Senator or Member to be initiated,
organised and or financed from outside the electorate concerned.
In this work it is not intended to go into the question of the actual
machinery necessary to allow the electors to replace any Member or Senator
whom they have recalled. Rather it is the purpose to raise the point for
serious study by the electors themselves as to how they may determine what
basic protection changes they want in their Constitutions. Undoubtedly there
would be many competent persons who could work out the machinery necessary
to give full and proper legal effect to the WILL of the electors in this
matter.
Another extremely vital protection element for the people is that no
treaties, international conventions or agreements, and the like, should be
entered into by Parliament, or by executive action, without the specific
consent and authority of the people themselves. This point is raised because
such things are agreed to, far too often, without the people having the
faintest idea of the direct and indirect legal and other significances and
consequences of such actions.
Indeed, few would be the politicians, let alone the people, who would have
any conception of the far reaching effects that many such Treaties,
agreements and conventions could have upon Australia and the Australian way
of life. Under the influence, if not the manipulations, of international
interests, theorists and idealists, Ministers of the Crown far too often
persuade the legal government and the Houses of Parliament (under party
control) to agree to bind the nation and States without the full
implications of the legal, political and economic impacts being first
thoroughly publicly debated.
Even at this moment of writing there are agreements and conventions afoot of
which, in Australia, few indeed have any real knowledge; agreements and
conventions that can have far greater impact upon the liberty and way of
life in this country than some Ministers would care to fully explain.
The people should also insist that the Commonwealth and State Constitutions
be tightened to make it absolutely impossible for Ministers of the Crown and
Houses of Parliament to effect, what some would call, snide changes in the
Constitutions without a referendum of the people. Those who have made long
and deep researches into constitutional law are aware how these changes can
be affected without the real understanding of the people and most
politicians.
It cannot be denied that this country is suffering from "government by
regulation" and many writers have drawn attention to this indisputable fact.
In Commonwealth and State Parliaments the volume of legislation which is
implimented by subsequent departmental regulations is quite unbelievable.
Even during the last War, the noted N.S.W. constitutional authority, Dr.
Frank Louatt, K.C., was moved to direct attention to the fact that for every
1000 pages of Acts of Parliaments there were over 5000 pages of regulations.
In their own interests the people should forbid the passing of any
legislation which requires departmental regulations to impliment it. If
regulations are thought to be required then the parliamentarians, party
pressures notwithstanding, must be adamant that the departmental officers
seeking those regulations shall be brought before the bar of the House of
Parliament and made to publicly prove that such regulation is absolutely
vital in the interests of the people.
This Chapter advances but a few thoughts: a few of the many arising from
many long years of Constitutional research, coupled with both parliamentary
and departmental personal experience. They are offered to stimulate deeper
thought and study by the reader of this book.
It has been said of the great Henry Ford_of the "tin lizzy" fame_ that he
once stated:-
"It matters not how many degrees you may have after your name, unless you
can think, you are uneducated."
The writer hopes that the contents of this book will make you
THINK!
AND THEN ACT.
"BUT THEY SHALL SIT EVERY MAN UNDER HIS VINE AND UNDER HIS FIG TREE; AND
NONE SHALL MAKE THEM AFRAID;...."
MICAH I V, iv.
Posted by flora at 6:02 PM 0 comments
Labels: crown, Minister of the Crown, My Will, Parliament, People of the
Commonwealth
Older Posts Home
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom)
About Me
Sue Maynes
Researching private land ownership, the Commonwealth of Australia
Constitution (UK) 1900 and those who would be our masters and remove our
sovereignty.
View my complete profile
Search This Blog
powered by
Links
a.. Oz Central - The World
b.. Larry Hannigan's Australia
Subscribe To
Posts
Atom
Posts
All Comments
Atom
All Comments
Blog Archive
a.. ? 2009 (31)
a.. ? December (31)
a.. Civil Law
b.. Comparison of Common Law v Civil Law
c.. Colour of Law v Black Letter Law
d.. The Colour of Law in Australia
e.. Pt 1. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
f.. Pt 2. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
g.. Pt 3. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
h.. Pt 4. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
i.. Pt 5. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
j.. Pt 6. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
k.. Pt 7. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
l.. Pt 8. The QLD Constitution 2001 & the Removal of...
m.. Queensland Has 3 Constitutions
n.. Who Makes the Rules In & For Queensland?
o.. Brigalow Corporation
p.. Are Australians Already Enslaved?
q.. The Superiority of private Land Ownership Rights
r.. The Executive Government of Australia in 2009
s.. State Governments of Australia in 2009
t.. Courts of Australia in 2009
a.. ? 2010 (30)
a.. ? January (14)
a.. Index of December 2009 Research Information
b.. Background to the Commonwealth of Australia Consti...
c.. An Overview of The Commonwealth of Australia Const...
d.. Government Creation of a new Constitution
e.. WA and QLD and the 1900 Constitution
f.. COAG, Corporations and the New Government
g.. People of the Commonwealth
h.. Doubts About the Validity of the Constitution of t...
i.. Demand Request for Anna Bligh, Premier of QLD
j.. Reply from Anna Bligh, Premier of QLD
k.. QLD Public Letters of Support to the High Court
l.. Commonwealth Public Letters of Support to the High...
m.. An Overview of the Brigalow Corp Takeover of Austr...
n.. You tube videos on Queensland & its Constitution
a.. ? February (13)
a.. Index of December Research Information
b.. Index of January 2010 Research Information
c.. My Will - Part 1
d.. My Will - Part 2
e.. My Will - Part 3
f.. My Will - Part 4
g.. My Will - Part 5
h.. My Will - Part 6
i.. My Will - Part 7
j.. My Will - Part 8
k.. My Will - Appendix
l.. Notes from the Sydney Cooee Rally - 24 Feb 2010
m.. A Prayer for the People of the Commonwealth
a.. ? August (2)
a.. Update on the matter of the Rights of the People o...
b.. Brief Overview with regard the Previous Posting
a.. ? September (1)
a.. Why This Corporate Government is Not Our Governmen...
Important
a.. Bill of Rights 1689
b.. Environment Protections & Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999
c.. Habeus Corpus Act 1679
d.. Magna Carta 1215
e.. The Global Biodiversity Assessment Report
Australia
a.. Chapter III Courts
b.. Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (UK) 1900
c.. Details of Commonwealth of Australia Constitution 1900
d.. Referendums in Australia
e.. Separation of Powers
High Court Cases
a.. Commonwealth v NSW 1923
b.. George v Rockett 1990
c.. Halliday v Nevill 1984
d.. Hillpalm P/L v Heaven's Door P/L 2004
e.. Kuru v NSW 2008
f.. Lapin v Abigail 1930
g.. NSW v Ibbett 2006
h.. Pirie v Registrar-General 1962
i.. Plenty v Dillon 1991
j.. Sue v Hill 1999
NWO Sites
a.. Takeover of the World
Labels
a.. absolute taking (1)
b.. Admiralty Law (2)
c.. alienation (1)
d.. Anna Bligh (4)
e.. Arthur Chresby (2)
f.. Australia Act 1986 (4)
g.. Balfour Declaration 1926 (1)
h.. Bill of Rights 1689 (4)
i.. Bills (2)
j.. birth certificates (1)
k.. Black Letter law (1)
l.. Bob Hawke (1)
m.. Bone v Mothershaw (1)
n.. Brigalow Corporation (7)
o.. Chapter III Court (1)
p.. Christian monarchy (1)
q.. citizens (1)
r.. civil law (5)
s.. COAG (2)
t.. colour of law (2)
u.. common law (11)
v.. Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act (17)
w.. communities (1)
x.. compensation (1)
y.. contract (2)
z.. corporate governments (1)
aa.. corporeal hereditaments (1)
ab.. courts (2)
ac.. covenant (1)
ad.. Crimes Act 1914 (1)
ae.. Criminal code (1)
af.. crown (7)
ag.. de jure (1)
ah.. deception (1)
ai.. Deed of Grant in Fee Simple (2)
aj.. deeds (2)
ak.. defact (1)
al.. democracy (2)
am.. draft constitution (1)
an.. elections (4)
ao.. England (1)
ap.. entities (1)
aq.. environment (1)
ar.. Executive (1)
as.. executive government (3)
at.. Fabian Society (1)
au.. Federal Council of Australasia (2)
av.. Fee Simple (6)
aw.. free and common socage (1)
ax.. free man and women (1)
ay.. freehold (1)
az.. Gough Whitlam (1)
ba.. Governor in Council (2)
bb.. governor of QLD (2)
bc.. Governor-General (9)
bd.. Great Seal of Australia (3)
be.. Habeus Corpus (2)
bf.. high court rulings (6)
bg.. House of Representatives (1)
bh.. human rights (1)
bi.. income tax (2)
bj.. incorporeal hereditaments (1)
bk.. individual (1)
bl.. Inheritable Estate (1)
bm.. instrument (1)
bn.. John Lilburne (1)
bo.. Judiciary (1)
bp.. jurisdiction (1)
bq.. land ownership (3)
br.. Land Tenures (3)
bs.. legislation (2)
bt.. Legislative Assembly (1)
bu.. licence and fine (1)
bv.. Lipohar v The Queen (2)
bw.. Local councils (1)
bx.. Mabo and Ano v the State of QLD (2)
by.. Magna Carta (4)
bz.. maritime law (1)
ca.. Marxism (1)
cb.. messuages (1)
cc.. Minister of the Crown (4)
cd.. My Will (9)
ce.. Newcrest Mining Ltd v The Commonwealth of Australia (1)
cf.. no entry (1)
cg.. Parliament (1)
ch.. Parliament of QLD (3)
ci.. Parliamentarian (3)
cj.. Parliamentary Secretary (1)
ck.. People of the Commonwealth (3)
cl.. permission (2)
cm.. person (2)
cn.. political party (2)
co.. Preamble (1)
cp.. premier (4)
cq.. Prime Minister (2)
cr.. private land (1)
cs.. public officials (1)
ct.. QLD Constitution 1867 (5)
cu.. QLD Constitution 2001 (10)
cv.. QLD Corporation (1)
cw.. QLD Treasury Corporation (1)
cx.. Queen (2)
cy.. Queen Elizabeth II (3)
cz.. Queen of Australia (2)
da.. Queen Victoria (1)
db.. Queensland (2)
dc.. Quen Elizabeth II (1)
dd.. reasonable belief (1)
de.. referendum (6)
df.. Registrar-General (1)
dg.. registration (1)
dh.. republic (2)
di.. rights (3)
dj.. roman law (1)
dk.. Royal and Parliamentary Titles Act 1927 (1)
dl.. Royal Seal (2)
dm.. scutage (1)
dn.. Senate (2)
do.. Separation of Powers (2)
dp.. Sir John Kerr (1)
dq.. socialist law (1)
dr.. sovereign (1)
ds.. sovereign people (5)
dt.. Speaker of the House (1)
du.. Star Chamber (1)
dv.. State Constitutions (1)
dw.. State Governors (2)
dx.. statutory instruments (1)
dy.. Supreme Court (1)
dz.. tenant in common (1)
ea.. tenements (1)
eb.. tenure (1)
ec.. the States (2)
ed.. Torrens Title (2)
ee.. trespass (2)
ef.. trial (1)
eg.. WA (1)
eh.. Westminster System (2)
ei.. William Blackstone (1)
ej.. Your Will Be Done (5)
No comments:
Post a Comment