LAWYERS MAFIA - A FACT OR REALITY? BY PETER MARKAN

Lawyers mafia - a fact or reality ? - Public Awareness Campaign. Lawyers Mafia is maintaining the illusion of power, which is only as strong as they think we believe it is, and only as long as we allow them to. Below - next stage of the fight with 'homo brutanicus'. COURT OF APPEAL SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND CA NUMBER : 5272/13 SC Number : 928/13 Applicant : Peter Markan AND Defendant : Bar Association of Queensland NOTICE OF APPEAL To the respondent And to the Registrar of Supreme Court of Queensland, TAKE NOTICE that the appellant appeals to the Court of Appeal against the whole order by judge Roslyn G Atkinson of Supreme Court of Queensland 1. Date of Judgment: 07.06.2013 Description of Proceedings: Supreme Court NUMBER : 928/13 Description of parties involved in the proceedings : Plaintiff : Peter Markan AND Defendant: Bar Association of Queensland Name of Primary Court Judge: Roslyn G Atkinson Location of Primary Court: SUPREME COURT OF QUEENSLAND 2. GROUNDS - The subject of my application to this Court relates to the issues of: Ø the lack of respect for the human rights in Queensland; Ø racist attitude, discrimination and vilification of people who are not lawyers and not of anglo origin and who represent themselves in courts; Ø denial of the protection by law to those people; Ø treatment of those people by 'public institutions' and courts as SECOND CLASS CITIZENS. The Applicant demands that his human rights are acknowledged and respected. Particularly, the provisions of Article 14 of The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights - 'All persons shall be equal before the courts and tribunals. In the determination of any criminal charge against him, or of his rights and obligations in a suit at law, everyone shall be entitled to a fair and public hearing by a competent, independent and impartial tribunal established by law". The Applicant rejects the 'order' made by Ms Roslyn G Atkinson during the hearing on 07.06.2013 as unlawful and illegal - as being blatant abuse of the International and Australian laws. The Applicant is not accepting such purported 'order' made by Ms Atkinson but is merely acknowledging that Ms Atkinson publically made statements in relation to the matter - Peter Markan v Bar Association of Queensland. Ms Atkinson conduct indicates serious problems with administration of justice in Queensland: Ø Judges are given so called 'immunity' permitting them to say any rubbish they choose without having legal responsibility for what they say Ø There is no effective community supervision of judicial conduct and decisions Ø The feudal concepts of 'masters' and 'slaves' are maintained under pretext of 'respect for tradition' Ø Atrocious dogmas are promoted and 'cannot' be amended because of overwhelming policy of 'protection' of moronic 'authorities' In practical terms Ms Atkinson choose to ignore the evidence before her, particularly relating to the issue of the 'cause of action' as documented by the validity of 'Balfour Declaration' as legally binding document. ( in her 'judgment' NOT EVEN ONE WORD about that important matter ) The justification for the 'setting aside' and 'strike out' my application involves juggling of irrelevant 'authorities' instead of rational look at BAQ conduct. Particularly, an attempt to disqualify 'service' as not a part of 'trade or commerce' is preposterous. Trade IS = Purchase and sale of goods and services between individuals, businesses, states or nations. Not to mention the fact that Bar Association of Queensland is registered with ASIC as a commercial organization and not eg.'charity'- and PAYING GST ! Ms Atkinson accusation that my Claim 'merely make scandalous accusations' is not supported by ANY explanations. Ms Atkinson is involved in the abuse of internationally recognized legal standards, The International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and Australian Human Rights Commission Act 1986. Ms Atkinson is involved in the abuse of judicial discretion which has been exercised arbitrarily and capriciously and in bad faith. The abuse resulted in a manifest injustice. Ms Roslyn G Atkinson conduct brings the administration of justice in Queensland into disrepute and has impact on the issue of integrity and respect for the law affecting Queensland legal system as the whole. 3. ORDERS SOUGHT - - The Applicant requests the Supreme Court to pronounce the 'order' by Ms. Atkinson from 07.06.2013 in this matter ( 928/13 ) as null and void - not having any legal consequences, the verdict set aside and order the new hearing. - The Applicant requests the Supreme Court to select truly neutral, independent and impartial arbiter, conforming to internationally recognized standards, to preside over the court hearing against ' Bar Association of Queensland '. Signed: Description: Plaintiff Dated: 12.06.2013 Information about my battle with the devilish forces in barbaric Queensland with the copies of relevant documents )is on - www.petermarkan.o........ - www.queenslandinstitute.o..........and some others . (my opponents are using various tricks to hinder access to those sites, Google helps by blocking search results) You are receiving this email as the person of public importance and the matters this message refer to are not only personal but also public importance as well . Respectfully Peter Markan This message is sent by Peter Markan 64 Wishart Rd Up . Mt Gravatt . Qld . 4122 , Australia petermarkan@queenslandinstitute.org If this message was sent in error please write word ' remove ' in email to petermarkan@queenslandinstitute.org