I WANT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM TO DEAL WITH ME FAIRLY: I SHOULD NOT BE PERSECUTED FOR NO PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT. I WANT TO UPHOLD THE PUBLIC INTERESTS THAT THE COMMON PEOPLE GET FAIR LEGAL SERVICES
Wednesday, August 17, 2011
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS IN VR 87 OF 2009 ON 8.4.2011 BEFORE HIS HONOUR JUDGE SHARP DEPUTY PRESIDENT OF SAT
MS. LE MIERE OF THE LPCC APPEARED MOMENTARILY ONLY ON 8.4.2011 BEFORE JUDGE SHARP. SHE ASKED TO BE EXCUSED TO ATTEND SOMETHING MORE URGENT AT THE SUPREME COURT. WHY WAS SHE RUNNING AWAY? SHE WAS EXCUSED AND SHE LEFT MS. NORTON THERE WHO WAS NOT ABLE TO ANSWER MY EIGHT QUESTIONS I HAVE ASKED TO BE ANSWERED IN MY LETTER DATED 21.3.2011. THIS LETTER IS IN THIS WEBSITE. IT WAS SENT TO BOTH THE LPCC AND SAT AT THE SAME TIME. THIS LETTER MAKES IT OBLIGATORY BY ME THAT THE LPCC DO ANSWER MY EIGHT QUESTIONS ON THAT SESSION ON 8.4.2011, FAILING WHICH, THE LPCC IS TAKEN TO HAVE ADMITTED TO THOSE RHETORICAL QUESTIONS. A RHETORICAL QUESTION IS DEFINED AS ONE TO WHICH THE ANSWERS TO IT IS SELF-EVIDENT.
IS THIS THE CASE OF THE GUILTY FLEE BEHAVIOUR OF SOMEONE WHO IS TRYING TO EVADE AN ISSUE. WHY ARE THE COURTS REFUSING TO PROVIDE ME A STATEMENT OF REASON FOR THE FOUR ISSUES. AS THESE PROCEEDINGS HAVE COME A LONG WAY, THE ISSUES ARE NOW CLEAR: THERE ARE ONLY FOUR ISSUES: THIES MISCONDUCT, TAYLOR MISCONDUCT, THE PSEUDO BOARD AND THE CONSENT JUDGMENT OF PRESIDENT STEYTLER OF THE COURT OF APPEAL.
MS. LE MIERE OF THE LPCC APPEARED MOMENTARILY ONLY ON 8.4.2011 BEFORE JUDGE SHARP. SHE ASKED TO BE EXCUSED TO ATTEND SOMETHING MORE URGENT AT THE SUPREME COURT. WHY WAS SHE RUNNING AWAY? SHE WAS EXCUSED AND SHE LEFT MS. NORTON THERE WHO WAS NOT ABLE TO ANSWER MY EIGHT QUESTIONS I HAVE ASKED TO BE ANSWERED IN MY LETTER DATED 21.3.2011. THIS LETTER IS IN THIS WEBSITE. IT WAS SENT TO BOTH THE LPCC AND SAT AT THE SAME TIME. THIS LETTER MAKES IT OBLIGATORY BY ME THAT THE LPCC DO ANSWER MY EIGHT QUESTIONS ON THAT SESSION ON 8.4.2011, FAILING WHICH, THE LPCC IS TAKEN TO HAVE ADMITTED TO THOSE RHETORICAL QUESTIONS. A RHETORICAL QUESTION IS DEFINED AS ONE TO WHICH THE ANSWERS TO IT IS SELF-EVIDENT.
ReplyDeleteIS THIS THE CASE OF THE GUILTY FLEE BEHAVIOUR OF SOMEONE WHO IS TRYING TO EVADE AN ISSUE. WHY ARE THE COURTS REFUSING TO PROVIDE ME A STATEMENT OF REASON FOR THE FOUR ISSUES. AS THESE PROCEEDINGS HAVE COME A LONG WAY, THE ISSUES ARE NOW CLEAR: THERE ARE ONLY FOUR ISSUES: THIES MISCONDUCT, TAYLOR MISCONDUCT, THE PSEUDO BOARD AND THE CONSENT JUDGMENT OF PRESIDENT STEYTLER OF THE COURT OF APPEAL.
ReplyDelete