COMPLAINT PROCEDURE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: RE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OR PIRATE SHIP AUSTRALIA, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Judicial Apartheid

COMPLAINT PROCEDURE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: RE COMMONWEALTH OF AUSTRALIA OR PIRATE SHIP AUSTRALIA, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and Judicial Apartheid Inbox x chas x 11:54 (16 hours ago) to ethicsoffice, cuba_onu, chinamission_un, misionvene, missionecuador, cp, indigenous, urgent-action, migrant, sr-torture, ie-internation., OTP, palestine, info, Ben, FKLegal, Tamar_Hopkins, senator.brandis, office, robert.clark, Attorney, Minister.Misch., agd, Brian.Wightman, corbell The UN is the guardian of several new international standards addressing accountability and transparency, such as the UN Convention Against Corruption and the UN Global Compact. As such, we should practise what we preach. We need to preserve and invest in one of our greatest assets: moral credibility. A reputation for honesty and integrity is indispensable to the work we do. To contact us, please call our Helpline: +1-917-367-9858 or email us: ethicsoffice@un.org. The UN Ethics Office, The Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, James Anaya. Mr Alfred de Zayas @Alfreddezayas, Prosecutor International Criminal Court, UN Human Rights Council, Permanent Observer Mission of the State of Palestine to the United Nations, Other Rapporeurs, Friends and Human Rights Defenders, Dear Sirs and Madams, 1. Given that Australian Government has a seat on the UN Security Council, and has opportunity at its presidency, the chance of them tampering with the UN process(es) are almost given; 2. They have broken every Treaty they have signed with the UN; subjecting Aborigines and Refugees to genocide and crimes against humanity; 3. Is there anything that the Ethics Office of UN can do to assist us at UN Human Rights Council Branch, even with the new procedure? 4. COMPLAINT PROCEDURE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: addresses consistent patterns of gross and reliably attested violations of all human rights and fundamental freedoms occurring in any part of the world and under any circumstances (Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 of 18 June 2007), modified to ensure that the procedure is impartial, objective, efficient, victims oriented and conducted in a timely manner. 5. We would like to congratulate the new members of the Human Rights Council and look forward to working with you to educate on the definition and protection mechanisms against Genocide and Crimes against Humanity, including Judicial Apartheid. 6. The signed attachments have been sent to the relevant UN bodies. With Respect, Djuran Bunjileenee Borun MunDunDarung robbiethorpe@gmail.com http://treatyrepublic.net/ SIGNATURE Le Tuan Pham nwn.webmaster@gmail.com http://judicialcorruptionaustralia.tk SIGNATURE The Ethics Office promotes an ethical organizational culture based on our shared values of integrity, accountability, transparency and respect. We are: Independent from management and all other UN offices. Impartial in how we treat individuals. Confidential with information that is entrusted to us. Professional in our dealings with our stakeholders. The Ethics Office was established in 2006 to secure the highest standards of integrity of staff members in accordance with Article 101, paragraph 3, of the Charter of the United Nations, taking into consideration paragraph 161 of the2005 World Summit Outcome and pursuant to General Assembly resolution 60/248. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Cuba Permanent Mission to UN Address: 315 Lexington Ave, New York, N.Y. 10016 Telephone: (212) 689 7216 Fax: (212) 689 9073 E-mail: cuba_onu@cubanmission.com Permanent Mission of the People's Republic of China to the UN Address: 350 East 35th Street, Manhattan, New York, NY 10016, USA http://www.china-un.org/eng/ Email：chinamission_un@mfa.gov.cn Mission Directorate, 335 East 46th Street, New York, New York 10017 Phone: (212) 557-2055 Central (212) 557-3528 fax Email misionvene@venezuelaonu.gob.ve Permanent Mission of Ecuador to the United Nations 866 United Nations Plaza, Room 516, New York, N.Y. 10017 Telephone: (212) 935-1680, -1681 Telefax: (212) 935-1835 e-mail: missionecuador@nyct.net ============================== Complaint Procedure Unit Human Rights Council Branch Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights United Nations Office at Geneva CH-1211 Geneva 10, Switzerland Mr. Alfred de Zayas Independent Expert on the promotion of a democratic and equitable international order Palais des Nations CH-1211 Geneva 10 Switzerland Fax: + 41 22 917 9006 Email: ie-internationalorder@ohchr.org Communications and claims under art.15 of the Rome Statute may be addressed to: Information and Evidence Unit Office of the Prosecutor Post Office Box 19519 2500 CM The Hague The Netherlands or sent by email to otp.informationdesk@icc-cpi.int, or sent by facsimile to +31 70 515 8555. Permanent Observer Mission of the State of Palestine to the United Nations 115 East 65th Street New York, NY 10065 Telephone: 212-288-8500 Fax: 212-517-2377 Email: palestine@un.int The Special Rapporteur on the rights of indigenous peoples, James Anaya. Mr Alfred de Zayas @Alfreddezayas, Prosecutor International Criminal Court, UN Human Rights Council, Permanent Observer Mission of the State of Palestine to the United Nations, Other Rapporeurs, Friends and Human Rights Defenders, Dear Sirs and Madams, 1. We wish to further submit additional statements, facts and evidence, on the Crimes of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity, especially of Judicial Apartheid, conducted, aided and abetted by the Commonwealth of Australia, Australian Government, Government Officers and or Officials, Judicial and Tribunal Officers and or Officials. 2. We wish for Permanent Observer Mission of the State of Palestine to the United Nations, to continue assisting us for the re-affirmation of the definition of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity; their knowledge and expertise will be invaluable for the education of u in particular, and of the World and Leaders. 3. If memories serve me right, Mr Michael Ahrens of Transparency International Australia indicated that he does not have funding. We have not asked him to do much more then observe and report; whatever his mandate is, we would wish for him to carry it out. 4. WE will send the signed documents straight after this email. We wished for our private details, signatures, address and phone numbers, to be kept private. With Respect, Djuran Bunjileenee Borun MunDunDarung robbiethorpe@gmail.com http://treatyrepublic.net/ Le Tuan Pham nwn.webmaster@gmail.com http://judicialcorruptionaustralia.tk ============================= A Nation of Pedophiles protected by the Unconscionable and Dishonorable High Court Australia, in a Conspiracy of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity of Judicial Apartheid, in order to deny Aborigines and Immigrants access to Treaties, With Australians and United Nations Identification of the person(s) or organization(s) submitting the communication: Djuran Bunjileenee Borun MunDunDarung robbiethorpe@gmail.com http://treatyrepublic.net/ SIGNATURE: Le Tuan Pham nwn.webmaster@gmail.com http://judicialcorruptionaustralia.tk SIGNATURE: Identification of the alleged victim(s): · Djuran Bunjileenee Borun MunDunDarung (Also know as Robert Alan Thorpe) · Krauatatungalung Tjapwhurong and other Aborigines Peoples; · TJ Hickey and other Aborigines Peoples; · Le Tuan Pham, Ethnicity: Vietnamese, Racial: south-east Asia · Phuong Ngo, Vietnamese and SouthEast Asians. Inter alia; Identification of the alleged perpetrators of the violation (if known) · Commonwealth of Australia · Executive Branch of the Commonwealth of Australia (Australian Government); · Judiciary Branch of the Commonwealth of Australia; French CJ, Hayne, Crennan, Kiefel JJ, inter alia · Federal and State Police; · Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission (Cth) (Human Rights Commission) · Victoria Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission; · Victorian Attorney General Robert Clark Inter alia; · UNIVERSAL DECLARATION OF HUMAN RIGHTS · ROME STATUTE OF THE INTERNATIONAL CRIMINAL COURT · International Criminal Court Act 2002 (Cth) An Act to facilitate compliance by Australia with obligations under the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and for related purposes · International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination · Racial Discrimination Act 1975 (Cth) · Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission Act 1986 (Cth) · Disability Discrimination Act 1992 (Cth) · International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Optional Protocol to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights Article 1 · The Australian Constitution (UK) An Act to constitute the Commonwealth of Australia [9th July 1900] · JUDICIARY ACT 1903 (Cth) · CRIMES ACT 1914 (Cth) · CHARTER OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES ACT 2006 (VIC) · ADMINISTRATIVE DECISIONS (JUDICIAL REVIEW) ACT 1977 (Cth) · Administrative Law Act 1978 (VIC) · Inter alia · · CODE OF JUDICIAL CONDUCT THE BANGALORE DRAFT o WHEREAS the importance of a competent, independent and impartial judiciary to the protection of human rights is given emphasis by the fact that the implementation of all the other rights ultimately depends upon the proper administration of justice. · Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions (Paris Principles) Competence and responsibilities 1. A national institution shall be vested with competence to promote and protect human rights. Composition and guarantees of independence and pluralism Inter alia. We Hold these Truths to be Self Evident 1. In honour of the man, Mr Nelson Mandela, and his work, against oppressive and Unconscionable Apartheid, we file this submission to the United Nations and the Internal Criminal Court, against the High Court Australia and Australian Judiciary, in conspiracy with the Australian Government to pervert their own laws and International Treaties, as a means for Genocide and Crime against Humanity of Apartheid. 2. One death is a tragedy and a million deaths are a million tragedies. How many more deaths do we need to present to the UN and the ICC before the UN and ICC will act? 3. Is it the intention of the United Nations and the ICC to allow the unconscionable conduct of the Australian Judiciary and the Australian Government; we do not need to reharsh the definition to the UN and ICC: Corroborating Evidence and Facts: Same Corruption Tactics on Immigrants, used on Australian Aborigines On May 26, 2010, the Chinese man who died after crawling in agony out of his police cell was the second prisoner to die after being arrested by Dandenong police in the past six months. Dandenong had been highlighted as a problem area for prisoners before the latest deaths. A report into conditions for people in custody by the Office of Police Integrity and the ombudsman in 2006 showed that Dandenong police station was suffering serious problems in its cells the previous year. The report showed that between July 2004 and June 2005 there were 142 recorded incidents involving prisoners becoming ill in police cells. CCTV footage shows the 53-year-old man doubled over and bleeding as he left his cell, pleading for help - with an interpreter saying he had been treated like a dog. The 1991 royal commission into deaths in custody recommended that police ''should regard it as a serious breach of discipline for an officer to speak to a detainee in a deliberately hurtful or provocative manner''. The man's interpreter, known only as Jay Jay, said police told her ''he was dying anyway''. Jay Jay said she was receiving counselling and having nightmares after witnessing the man's degradation and suffering. He was dumped outside the station in the rain with the interpreter, waiting for an ambulance. He died the next day in hospital. The Chinese community, as well as the wider community, is shocked and disgusted to learn that a sick man in custody was ignored for an extended period of time when he asked for assistance from the Victoria Police; particularly disturbing that police failed to call for immediate medical assistance for somebody who was obviously in distress. The man's death came to light only after Jay Jay heard that a 23-year-old Meadow Heights man, of Turkish origin, had died in police custody this week. In Bare v Small [2013] VSC 129 (25 March 2013), WILLIAMS J indicated: 6(3) - Does section 40(4)(b)(i) of the [Police Integrity Act] authorise the making of a decision that is incompatible with [Mr Bare’s] right to an effective investigation of his complaint of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment? 192 Question 6(3) is premised upon the existence of the asserted implied procedural right under s 10(b) and I will not answer it. In effect that there is NO right to an effective investigation of complaint of cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment by Victoria Police or other officials. What William J refused to answer, the existence of the asserted implied procedural right under s 10(b), is explicitly stated in Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 - SECT 8 Recognition and equality before the law 8. Recognition and equality before the law (1) Every person has the right to recognition as a person before the law. (2) Every person has the right to enjoy his or her human rights without discrimination. (3) Every person is equal before the law and is entitled to the equal protection of the law without discrimination and has the right to equal and effective protection against discrimination. Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 - SECT 9 Right to life 9. Right to life Every person has the right to life and has the right not to be arbitrarily deprived of life. Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 - SECT 10 Protection from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment 10. Protection from torture and cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment A person must not be- (a) subjected to torture; or (b) treated or punished in a cruel, inhuman or degrading way; or (c) subjected to medical or scientific experimentation or treatment without his or her full, free and informed consent. Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 - SECT 13 Privacy and reputation 13. Privacy and reputation A person has the right- (a) not to have his or her privacy, family, home or correspondence unlawfully or arbitrarily interfered with; and (b) not to have his or her reputation unlawfully attacked. Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 - SECT 21 Right to liberty and security of person 21. Right to liberty and security of person (1) Every person has the right to liberty and security. (2) A person must not be subjected to arbitrary arrest or detention. (3) A person must not be deprived of his or her liberty except on grounds, and in accordance with procedures, established by law. (4) A person who is arrested or detained must be informed at the time of arrest or detention of the reason for the arrest or detention and must be promptly informed about any proceedings to be brought against him or her. (5) A person who is arrested or detained on a criminal charge- (a) must be promptly brought before a court; and (b) has the right to be brought to trial without unreasonable delay; and (c) must be released if paragraph (a) or (b) is not complied with. (6) A person awaiting trial must not be automatically detained in custody, but his or her release may be subject to guarantees to attend- (a) for trial; and (b) at any other stage of the judicial proceeding; and (c) if appropriate, for execution of judgment. (7) Any person deprived of liberty by arrest or detention is entitled to apply to a court for a declaration or order regarding the lawfulness of his or her detention, and the court must- (a) make a decision without delay; and (b) order the release of the person if it finds that the detention is unlawful. (8) A person must not be imprisoned only because of his or her inability to perform a contractual obligation. Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 - SECT 22 Humane treatment when deprived of liberty 22. Humane treatment when deprived of liberty (1) All persons deprived of liberty must be treated with humanity and with respect for the inherent dignity of the human person. (2) An accused person who is detained or a person detained without charge must be segregated from persons who have been convicted of offences, except where reasonably necessary. (3) An accused person who is detained or a person detained without charge must be treated in a way that is appropriate for a person who has not been convicted. Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006 - SECT 24 Fair hearing 24. Fair hearing (1) A person charged with a criminal offence or a party to a civil proceeding has the right to have the charge or proceeding decided by a competent, independent and impartial court or tribunal after a fair and public hearing. The Incompetence is in Victorian Equal Opportunity and Human Rights Commission, and the Attorney-General for the State of Victoria to intervene in order to undermine the Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities Act 2006, and the aforementioned sections, inter alia. Heavy Reliance on the ineptitude of Lawyers is the Apartheid enslavement in ineptitude: 4. Article 5: Crimes within the jurisdiction of the Court 1. The jurisdiction of the Court shall be limited to the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole. The Court has jurisdiction in accordance with this Statute with respect to the following crimes: (a) The crime of genocide; (b) Crimes against humanity; 5. Article 7: Crimes against humanity 1. For the purpose of this Statute, "crime against humanity" means any of the following acts when committed as part of a widespread or systematic attack directed against any civilian population, with knowledge of the attack: (a) Murder; (d) Deportation or forcible transfer of population; (e) Imprisonment or other severe deprivation of physical liberty in violation of fundamental rules of international law; (f) Torture; (h) Persecution against any identifiable group or collectivity on political, racial, national, ethnic, cultural, religious, gender as defined in paragraph 3, or other grounds that are universally recognized as impermissible under international law, in connection with any act referred to in this paragraph or any crime within the jurisdiction of the Court; (i) Enforced disappearance of persons; (j) The crime of apartheid; (k) Other inhumane acts of a similar character intentionally causing great suffering, or serious injury to body or to mental or physical health. Inter alia. 2. For the purpose of paragraph 1: (a) "Attack directed against any civilian population" means a course of conduct involving the multiple commission of acts referred to in paragraph 1 against any civilian population, pursuant to or in furtherance of a State or organizational policy to commit such attack; (b) "Extermination" includes the intentional infliction of conditions of life, inter alia the deprivation of access to food and medicine, calculated to bring about the destruction of part of a population; (c) "Enslavement" means the exercise of any or all of the powers attaching to the right of ownership over a person and includes the exercise of such power in the course of trafficking in persons, in particular women and children; (d) "Deportation or forcible transfer of population" means forced displacement of the persons concerned by expulsion or other coercive acts from the area in which they are lawfully present, without grounds permitted under international law; (e) "Torture" means the intentional infliction of severe pain or suffering, whether physical or mental, upon a person in the custody or under the control of the accused; except that torture shall not include pain or suffering arising only from, inherent in or incidental to, lawful sanctions; (g) "Persecution" means the intentional and severe deprivation of fundamental rights contrary to international law by reason of the identity of the group or collectivity; (h) "The crime of apartheid" means inhumane acts of a character similar to those referred to in paragraph 1, committed in the context of an institutionalized regime of systematic oppression and domination by one racial group over any other racial group or groups and committed with the intention of maintaining that regime; (i) "Enforced disappearance of persons" means the arrest, detention or abduction of persons by, or with the authorization, support or acquiescence of, a State or a political organization, followed by a refusal to acknowledge that deprivation of freedom or to give information on the fate or whereabouts of those persons, with the intention of removing them from the protection of the law for a prolonged period of time. 6. The international legal definition of the crime of genocide is found in Articles II and III of the 1948 Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of Genocide. Article II describes two elements of the crime of genocide: 1) the mental element, meaning the "intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such", and 2) the physical element which includes five acts described in sections a, b, c, d and e. A crime must include both elements to be called "genocide." Article III described five punishable forms of the crime of genocide: genocide; conspiracy, incitement, attempt and complicity. 5. "Article II: In the present Convention, genocide means any of the following acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial or religious group, as such: (a) Killing members of the group; (b) Causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; (c) Deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; (d) Imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group; (e) Forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. Article III: The following acts shall be punishable: (a) Genocide; (b) Conspiracy to commit genocide; (c) Direct and public incitement to commit genocide; (d) Attempt to commit genocide; (e) Complicity in genocide. " 6. Punishable Acts The following are genocidal acts when committed as part of a policy to destroy a group's existence: · Killing members of the group includes direct killing and actions causing death. · Causing serious bodily or mental harm includes inflicting trauma on members of the group through widespread torture, rape, sexual violence, forced or coerced use of drugs, and mutilation. · Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy a group includes the deliberate deprivation of resources needed for the group's physical survival, such as clean water, food, clothing, shelter or medical services. Deprivation of the means to sustain life can be imposed through confiscation of harvests, blockade of foodstuffs, detention in camps, forcible relocation or expulsion into deserts. · (Prevention of births includes involuntary sterilization, forced abortion, prohibition of marriage, and long-term separation of men and women intended to prevent procreation.) · Forcible transfer of children may be imposed by direct force or by through fear of violence, duress, detention, psychological oppression or other methods of coercion. The Convention on the Rights of the Child defines children as persons under the age of 14 years. · Genocidal acts need not kill or cause the death of members of a group. Causing serious bodily or mental harm, prevention of births and transfer of children are acts of genocide when committed as part of a policy to destroy a group's existence: · It is a crime to plan or incite genocide, even before killing starts, and to aid or abet genocide: Criminal acts include conspiracy, direct and public incitement, attempts to commit genocide, and complicity in genocide. Key Terms · The crime of genocide has two elements: intent and action. "Intentional" means purposeful. Intent can be proven directly from statements or orders. But more often, it must be inferred from a systematic pattern of coordinated acts. · Intent is different from motive. Whatever may be the motive for the crime (land expropriation, national security, territorial integrity, etc.,) if the perpetrators commit acts intended to destroy a group, even part of a group, it is genocide. · The phrase "in whole or in part" is important. Perpetrators need not intend to destroy the entire group. Destruction of only part of a group (such as its educated members, or members living in one region) is also genocide. Most authorities require intent to destroy a substantial number of group members -- mass murder. But an individual criminal may be guilty of genocide even if he kills only one person, so long as he knew he was participating in a larger plan to destroy the group. · The law protects four groups - national, ethnical, racial or religious groups. Conscious that all peoples are united by common bonds, their cultures pieced together in a shared heritage, and concerned that this delicate mosaic may be shattered at any time, The Commonwealth of Australia was founded on stolen Aborigines and First Nations peoples’ Lands. The lack of a Treaty with the Indigenous Peoples amounts to theft and piracy pursuant to the International laws of the seas. The Crime of Genocide has been admitted to by Australian judges, and for which the Prime Minister has apologized for the Stolen Generation(s) of Aborigines children. Reconciliation and Reparation has not been forthcoming. Mindful that during this century millions of children, women and men have been victims of unimaginable atrocities that deeply shock the conscience of humanity, Yet it has been the Australian judiciary (ies) and High Court Australia who have denied the Aborigines and Immigrants the access to the Rule of Law and protection from criminal acts of genocide, murder, and Apartheid and other Crimes against Humanity. Recognizing that such grave crimes threaten the peace, security and well-being of the world, When there is a law enacted by the Commonwealth of Australia, the judges refuse to apply it. Affirming that the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole must not go unpunished and that their effective prosecution must be ensured by taking measures at the national level and by enhancing international cooperation, When there is material evidence and facts, the judges refuse to consider it. Determined to put an end to impunity for the perpetrators of these crimes and thus to contribute to the prevention of such crimes, The Commonwealth of Australia and the Australian Judiciaries, including the High Court Australia, conspire to breach the Separation of the “government” and the “judiciary” as in Exhibit 1: Recalling that it is the duty of every State to exercise its criminal jurisdiction over those responsible for international crimes, It’s a conspiracy which Michael Kirby J would label as “profiting from the proceeds of crime”. TACKLING JUDICIAL CORRUPTION – GLOBALLY http://www.hcourt.gov.au/assets/publications/speeches/former-justices/kirbyj/kirbyj_stjames.htm Reaffirming the Purposes and Principles of the Charter of the United Nations, and in particular that all States shall refrain from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any State, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations, It is a conspiracy with, collusion of and inherent threat to inept lawyers, “human rights” commission (States and Federal), •Principles relating to the Status of National Institutions (Paris Principles) Emphasizing in this connection that nothing in this Statute shall be taken as authorizing any State Party to intervene in an armed conflict or in the internal affairs of any State, The attack is on Community Leaders and Human Rights Defenders and any lawyer who would challenge the Apartheid system Determined to these ends and for the sake of present and future generations, to establish an independent permanent International Criminal Court in relationship with the United Nations system, with jurisdiction over the most serious crimes of concern to the international community as a whole, Race discrimination and racial vilification is based on the superiority of the ALL WHITE IMPROPERLY CONSTITUTED High Court Australia to read and interprete their own laws. Indeed, It is the IMPROPERLY CONSTITUTED High Court Australia that is refusing to interprete and make declarations on question of law for Community and Ethnic Leaders. Emphasizing that the International Criminal Court established under this Statute shall be complementary to national criminal jurisdictions, That may or may not be true, it is the Justice Peter Bell who determined that it’s the Duty of the Presiding Judge to assist the Unrepresented Litigants, where inept lawyers and human rights commissions failed to ask the pertinent questions. Resolved to guarantee lasting respect for and the enforcement of international justice, · A nation of Pedophiles, in a culture of coverup and protection, · A school system of bullies, leading to youth suicides. · A Defence Force rife with racial and sex discrimination and sexual assaults and rape. · Inept Lawyers and Human Rights Commissions colluding and in conspiracy to protect their own mates at the expense of public safety, · Inept Judges and High Court Australia refusing to hearing application for “prerogative writ” of Mandamus and or Prohibition, amounting to authoring unlawful conduct of the Commonwealth Officials, failing to interpret and make declarations on questions law put to them. FACTS: 1. In March to May 2013, Djuran Bunjileenee Borun MunDunDarung (AKA Robert Alan Thorpe), applied to the Supreme Court of Victoria to be heard on Human Rights Matters pursuant to the Victorian Administrative Law Act 1978 (VIC) and the Charter for Human Rights and Responsibility Act 2006 (VIC), the Charter 2. After witnessing human rights abuses and abuse of the Charter by the Victorian Civil and Administrative Appeals Tribunal (VCAT) Members (Wentworth and Deputy President I Lulham and President Garde J, inter alia); 3. In addition the the separate Charter of VCAT; 4. Court staff and Prothonotaries unlawfully removed the name Robert Thorpe, representing Djuran Bunjileenee Borun MunDunDarung 5. Various Associate Judges ignored Djuran Bunjileenee Borun MunDunDarung, and his Affidavits, treating him less than HUMAN; 6. The Judge Emerton, ignored his Affidavits and Applications, treating him less than HUMAN; 7. In October 2013, the High Court Judge Crennan refused WITHOUT reasons his application, for “prerogative writ” of Mandamus and or Prohibition and other reliefs according the Australian Constitution and Judiciary Act, and other declarations as to the application of Commonwealth and State Human Rights, Discriminatory and Vilification laws; 8. This abuse of Rule 2.06 of the High Court is an conspiracy with the Registrar of the High Court Denise Weybury to racially discriminate and vilify the Applicants, denying the Applicants the protection of the whiteman’s Law against crimes of Genocide and Crimes against Humanity; 9. This refusal amounts to Judicial Apartheid Deliberately inflicting conditions of life calculated to destroy a group, with 10. a sense of despair, hopelessness and inferiority; 11. The ineptitude of the Judge is compounded by the ignorance of the decision of Justice Peter Bell, who indicated that accoring to law, it is the duty of the presiding judge to clearly articulate and determine for unrepresented litigants the legal aspects of the case, and the Supreme Court of India, who states that Judgement without Reasons amounts to Denial of Justice; 12. It’s the collusion to attack Ethnic and Community leaders and Human Rights Defenders, in order to protect an Apartheid system of corruption, murder, genocide and other crimes against humanity for the profit of the few in positions of public trust (attachment and exhibit 1, shows the collusion against Mr O’Bryant, of the High court Australia and government lawyers in order to interfere with the administration of justice, and the independence and impartiality of the court process); 13. It is the authorization of crimes from the very improperly Constituted High Court Australia, aided and abetted with inadequate Legal Aid and inept Lawyers and Human Rights (sic) Commissions; 14. It’s the attempt at unlawful racial discrimination and racial vilification in an effort to brand community and ethnic leaders INFERIOR so that they can be “dispatched” by their henchmen of state and federal police. 15. In 2002, Mr Pham brought a case of Unlawful Racial Discrimination and Disability against the Royal Australian Navy and the Brisbane Hospital. 16. It was President John Von Doussa of the Human Rights and Equal Opportunity Commission who refused to investigate, 17. And it was the Federal Court Judge Robert French (Chief Justice of the High Court Australia), who refused to hear application for “prerogative writ” of Mandamus and or Prohibition and other reliefs according the Australian Constitution and Judiciary Act. 18. The result was that a woman was raped on the Defense Force Academy grounds or their surroundings, and other sexual assaults and racial discrimination acts; as an inappropriate culture admitted to by the Defense Force 19. The result was that Mr Pham received no treatment for his heart and cardiovascular treatment and resultant Retinal eye bleeding; 20. African Youths have been targeted by Victorian Police as tabled in their public papers by the Monash Legal Service. 21. TJ Hickey’s death and investigation have gone in front of the United Nations; once again unfortunately, the lawyers have failed to ask the correct questions, meaning 10 years after TJ Hickey’s Death we have a Chinese man dying in Victorian Police cell above; 22. And with NOONE to speak for him, noone to investigate; 23. AN ANOTHER WASTED LIFE. 24. COMPLAINT PROCEDURE OF THE HUMAN RIGHTS COUNCIL: addresses consistent patterns of gross and reliably attested violations of all human rights and fundamental freedoms occurring in any part of the world and under any circumstances (Human Rights Council resolution 5/1 of 18 June 2007). 25. The fact that it’s been modified to ensure that the procedure is impartial, objective, efficient, victims oriented and conducted in a timely manner, is both a concern and a relief for us; 26. The relief is that the Human Rights Council, recognizes there was a need to improve the process; 27. ... [Message clipped] View entire message 2 Attachments PDF Human Rights Council SUBMISSION 03022014_web(LITE).pdf PDF Collusion of the Cth and High Court Registry.pdf