EMAIL LETTER FROM MR. DANN DERMOTT AND MR. PETER MARKAN OF QUEENSLAND

e : INVOICE‏ Actions Dann Dermot (dermotdann@lawsociety.org)Add to contacts 03:01 To: nnchin09 Picture of Dann Dermot As the result of the understanding between Bar Association of Queensland and myself, where the parties have reached an agreement by virtue of their conduct, I provided to them the service of 'public ridicule' and 'public humiliation'. The service was provided in honest, fair and reasonable manner according to law and due process. It was done exercising my own forensic judgement consistently with applicable rules of conduct and my over-riding duty to the justice. On 2 documented occasions, in clear terms I asked the Defendant to fulfil their obligations and to pay the Invoice for the service I provided to them. On both occasions there was no response from the Defendant. By failing to perform without a legitimate excuse their legal obligation of paying the money due to me for the service I provided to them - they breached the law resulting in legal consequences. So, we are going through Queensland legal system. ********************************************************** 18.02.2014 - The Appeal against Bar Association of Queensland and Mr Fryberg heard by Appeal Court judges McMurdo, Muir, Mullins. In spite of 2 of them being judicial members of BAQ and being involved deeply with the daily workings of BAQ - they refused to recuse themselves. All of them were previously involved either in my appeal in personal matter or other appeal against BAQ. Using their own 'authority' which judges and lawyers love to quote Ebner v Official Trustee in Bankruptcy (2000) 205 CLR 337 where it is said in relation to the selection of an arbiter in the court case - "a judge is disqualified if a fair-minded lay observer might reasonably apprehend that the judge might not bring an impartial and unprejudiced mind to the resolution of the question the judge is required to decide." I challenged them to ask 'a fair-minded lay observer' what he/she thinks about them claiming to be 'impartial' arbiters in the matter involving their mates from BAQ. In reply I heard that this is a 'test' which is actually never being 'tested' (presumably 'assumed' that judges already known what 'a fair-minded lay observer' thinks) - and they declined my kind offer of verifying my personal opinion with opinions of other people in this matter. Regrettably, I forgot to thank them for participation and assistance in proving in anglo court of law that judges references to 'authorities', as supposedly valid legal arguments to justify judges decisions, are in fact fake, worthless bulshit stories without any meaning. I stated that I do not accept legitimacy of such court and I presented further arguments for the Appeal ONLY as I would in a legitimate court. And I reminded them that I do not consider them as legitimate court at the end of my presentation as well. 'Desision' reserved. To make it even more interesting Mr Muir will be managing/chairing next month the lecture for barristers at their Annual Conference at the Sheraton Mirage on the Gold Coast. Title of the lecture is very appropriate 'The Latest Word on 'Authority' and Other Significant Issues' - is he going to quote the application of 'Ebner......' in his own decision. May be someone should ask him? . Information about my battle with the devilish forces in barbaric Queensland ( with the copies of relevant documents ) is on - www.petermarkan.org/ - www.queenslandinstitute.org/ and some others . . You are receiving this email as the person of public importance and the matters this message refer to are not only personal but also public importance as well . Respectfully Peter Markan . This message is sent by Peter Markan 64 Wishart Rd Up . Mt Gravatt Qld . 4122 , Australia petermarkan@queenslandinstitute.org . If this message was sent in error please write word ' remove ' in email to petermarkan@queenslandinstitute.org