I WANT THE JUSTICE SYSTEM TO DEAL WITH ME FAIRLY: I SHOULD NOT BE PERSECUTED FOR NO PROFESSIONAL MISCONDUCT. I WANT TO UPHOLD THE PUBLIC INTERESTS THAT THE COMMON PEOPLE GET FAIR LEGAL SERVICES
Thursday, March 3, 2011
COURT OF APPEAL REGISTRAR REQUESTS IF I OBJECT TO ANY MEMBER OF THE PANEL OF JUDGES HEARING MY APPEAL IN CACV 41 OF 2010 AT 10.30 AM ON 11.3.2011
For CACV 107 of 2008, His Honour Newnes JA was only involved in the interim stages of that appeal. His Honour was not involved in the giving of deficient reasons in that appeal.
For CACV 75 of 2010, His Honour Newnes J was involved in allowing solicitor Timothy Robin Thies to be admitted into my application for leave to appeal Ken Martin J's decision in the second stage of CIV 1903 of 2008 under circumstances when the latter was not supposed to be admitted. Once he was admitted into that application, he was not required to answer my Appellant's case when the law makes it mandatory for the latter to do so. Further Newnes J was involved in providing deficient reasons in that judgment.
See my amended Facsimile re-sent to the Court of Appeal Registrar to day.
ReplyDeleteFor CACV 107 of 2008, His Honour Newnes JA was only involved in the interim stages of that appeal. His Honour was not involved in the giving of deficient reasons in that appeal.
ReplyDeleteFor CACV 75 of 2010, His Honour Newnes J was involved in allowing solicitor Timothy Robin Thies to be admitted into my application for leave to appeal Ken Martin J's decision in the second stage of CIV 1903 of 2008 under circumstances when the latter was not supposed to be admitted. Once he was admitted into that application, he was not required to answer my Appellant's case when the law makes it mandatory for the latter to do so. Further Newnes J was involved in providing deficient reasons in that judgment.
ReplyDeleteIn CACV 105 of 2008, News JA was involved in providing deficient reasons for that judgment together with Pullin JA.
ReplyDelete