 | Nicholas N Chin <nnchin1@gmail.com> |
HIGH COURT SPECIAL LEAVE DISPOSITIONS: CHIN V THIES & ANOR (P50-2010) [2011] HCASL 25(9 March, 2011)
2 messages
| Nicholas N Chin <nnchin1@gmail.com> | Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:54 AM | |
| To: crogers@hcourt.gov.au Cc: enquiries@hcourt.gov.au, courtofappeal.office@justice.wa.gov.au, eddieh@westnet.com.au, Associate.Justice.Newnes@justice.wa.gov.au, Associate.Justice.Pullin@justice.wa.gov.au, piccc@piccc.wa.gov.au, simon.williams@police.wa.gov.au, Roger Hellier <Roger.Hellier@ccc.wa.gov.au>, Rose Noel <rtdcruz@gmail.com> | ||
| ||
| Nicholas N Chin <nnchin1@gmail.com> | Sun, Mar 13, 2011 at 11:56 AM | |||||
| To: crogers@hcourt.gov.au Cc: enquiries@hcourt.gov.au, courtofappeal.office@justice.wa.gov.au, eddieh@westnet.com.au, Associate.Justice.Newnes@justice.wa.gov.au, Associate.Justice.Pullin@justice.wa.gov.au, piccc@piccc.wa.gov.au, simon.williams@police.wa.gov.au, Roger Hellier <Roger.Hellier@ccc.wa.gov.au>, Rose Noel <rtdcruz@gmail.com> | ||||||
| ||||||
DOES THE HIGH COURT ALLOW A LAWYER TIMOTHY ROBIN THIES TO PILLAGE AND PLUNDER AN ORDINARY AUSTRALIAN, A PERSON WITH VULNERABILITIES, WITH NO RECOURSE TO JUSTICE?
ReplyDeleteDOES THE HIGH COURT CONDONE BARRISTER SCOTT ELLIS TO MISLEAD KEN MARTIN J OF THE SUPREME COURT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA THAT THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF DURESS EXERTED UPON REGISTRAR SUSAN WILDE OF THE FREMANTLE MAGISTRATES COURT ON 6.6.2007 WHEN SHE ENTERED INTO THE NON-CONSENSUAL JUDGMENT ON 7.6.2007?
ReplyDeleteDOES THE HIGH COURT NOT RECOGNIZE A UNIVERSAL PRINCIPLE OF LAW THAT THE LAWS OF AUSTRALIA CANNOT EXIST ALONE WITHOUT BEING BACKED UP BY THE STRICT PRINCIPLES OF MORALITY I.E. A PERSON CAN DO A BLATANT WRONG BY ROBBING ANOTHER AND YET HE IS BEING CONDONED BY THE LAW?
ReplyDeleteLOOK AT MY P50 OF 2010 APPLICATION TO THE HIGH COURT AT http://nicholasnchin.blogspot.com/2010/12/p50-of-2010-application-for-special.html.
ReplyDeleteALSO LOOK AT MY WRITTEN GROUNDS OF MY P50 OF 2010 APPLICATION TO THE HIGH AT:
http://wwwnicholasnchin.blogspot.com/2011/01/written-argument-for-p50-of-2010-filed.html
THE REGULATOR OF THE LEGAL PROFESSION OF WA WOULD NOT ALLOW ME TO LIVE BY STATING THAT I HAD MADE FALSE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST SOLICITOR TIMOTHY ROBIN THIES AND SOLICITOR DAVID TAYLOR WHEN ALL I SPOKE OF IS THE TRUTH. THE TRUTH IS ABOUT WANTING TO LIVE AND IS ASSOCIATED WITH ALL THINGS GOOD.
ReplyDeleteTHE EVIDENCE THAT I PROVIDED TO SUBSTANTIATE THE BIASED ATTITUDE OF THE LEARNED MAGISTRATE MUSK IS SPONTANEOUS AND NOT COOKED UP. I FORGIVE MY LEARNED FRIEND SOLICITOR TIMOTHY ROBIN THIES A LONG TIME AGO. BUT IT IS THE PUBLIC INTEREST THAT I AM TRYING TO PROTECT SO THAT AN ORDINARY AUSTRALIAN WILL NOT BE PLUNDERED AND PILLAGED.
ReplyDeleteI HAVE ASKED FOR THE HIGH COURT AT PERTH TO GIVE ME A CHANCE TO EXPLAIN MY CASE, BUT I WAS DENIED THIS CHANCE. IF I WERE GIVEN THIS CHANCE, THE OUTCOME MIGHT HAVE BEEN DIFFERENT, SIR.
ReplyDelete