Tuesday, March 29, 2011

MY EMAIL LETTER TO ALL MEMBERS OF PARLIAMENT OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA DATED 30.3.2010

MORAL RELATIVISM OF DISPARITY IN RULE ENFORCEMENTS - A QUAQMIRE WEST AUSTRALIANS WILL NOT WANT TO FALL INTO

Reply
|
fromNicholas N Chin <nnchin1@gmail.com>
tocourtofappeal.office@justice.wa.gov.au,
mail@ombudsman.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Porter@dpc.wa.gov.au,
simon.williams@police.wa.gov.au,
Roger.Hellier@ccc.wa.gov.au,
piccc@piccc.wa.gov.au,
murray.alder@piccc.wa.gov.au,
eddieh@westnet.com.au,
rob.johnson@mp.wa.gov.au,
peter.abetz@mp.wa.gov.au,
frank.alban@mp.wa.gov.au,
lisa.baker@mp.wa.gov.au,
Premier.Barnett@dpc.wa.gov.au,
ken.baston@mp.wa.gov.au,
liz.behjat@mp.wa.gov.au,
matt.benson@mp.wa.gov.au,
geraldton@mp.wa.gov.au,
john.bowler@mp.wa.gov.au,
ian.britza@mp.wa.gov.au,
helen.bullock@mp.wa.gov.au,
troy.buswell@mp.wa.gov.au,
adele.carles@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Castrilli@dpc.wa.gov.au,
john.castrilli@mp.wa.gov.au,
vincent.catania@mp.wa.gov.au,
robin.chapple@mp.wa.gov.au,
jim.chown@mp.wa.gov.au,
'Minister.Collier@dpc.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Constable@dpc.wa.gov.au,
elizabeth.constable@mp.wa.gov.au,
kwinana@mp.wa.gov.au,
murray.cowper@mp.wa.gov.au,
mia.davies@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Day@dpc.wa.gov.au,
john.day@mp.wa.gov.au,
ed.dermer@mp.wa.gov.au,
kate.doust@mp.wa.gov.au,
wendy.duncan@mp.wa.gov.au,
sue.ellery@mp.wa.gov.au,
brian.ellis@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Faragher@dpc.wa.gov.au,
adele.farina@mp.wa.gov.au,
shaz.fungclarke@mp.wa.gov.au,
nikki.day@mp.wa.gov.au,
joe.francis@mp.wa.gov.au,
nollamara@mp.wa.gov.au,
nick.goiran@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Grylls@dpc.wa.gov.au,
brendon.grylls@mp.wa.gov.au,
philippa.reid@mp.wa.gov.au,
kim.hames@mp.wa.gov.au,
liza.harvey@mp.wa.gov.au,
alyssa.hayden@mp.wa.gov.au,
colin.holt@mp.wa.gov.au,
lcoogan@parliament.wa.gov.au,
barry.house@mp.wa.gov.au,
john.hyde@mp.wa.gov.au,
albert.jacob@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Jacobs@dpc.wa.gov.au,
graham.jacobs@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Johnson@dpc.wa.gov.au,
cannington@mp.wa.gov.au,
john.kobelke@mp.wa.gov.au,
carine@mp.wa.gov.au,
fran.logan@mp.wa.gov.au,
lynn.maclaren@mp.wa.gov.au,
armadale@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Marmion@dpc.wa.gov.au,
bill.marmion@mp.wa.gov.au,
carol.martin@mp.wa.gov.au,
mark.mcgowan@mp.wa.gov.au,
john.mcgrath@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.McSweeney@dpc.wa.gov.au,
sandra.scott@mp.wa.gov.au,
wanneroo@mp.wa.gov.au,
michael.mischin@mp.wa.gov.au,
andrea.mitchell@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Moore@dpc.wa.gov.au,
norman.moore@mp.wa.gov.au,
helen.morton@mp.wa.gov.au,
mick.murray@mp.wa.gov.au,
mike.nahan@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.OBrien@dpc.wa.gov.au,
simon.obrien@mp.wa.gov.au,
joondalup@mp.wa.gov.au,
paul.papalia@mp.wa.gov.au,
christian.porter@mp.wa.gov.au,
john.quigley@mp.wa.gov.au,
girrawheen@mp.wa.gov.au,
melanie.archer@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Redman@dpc.wa.gov.au,
terry.redman@mp.wa.gov.au,
leader@loop.wa.gov.au,
midland@mp.wa.gov.au,
westswan@mp.wa.gov.au,
linda.savage@mp.wa.gov.au,
darlingrange@mp.wa.gov.au,
tom.stephens@mp.wa.gov.au,
michael.sutherland@mp.wa.gov.au,
sally.talbot@mp.wa.gov.au,
chris.tallentire@mp.wa.gov.au,
david.templeman@mp.wa.gov.au,
willagee@mp.wa.gov.au,
ken.travers@mp.wa.gov.au,
max.trenorden@mp.wa.gov.au,
andrew.waddell@mp.wa.gov.au,
Minister.Waldron@dpc.wa.gov.au,
twaldron@mp.wa.gov.au,
giz.watson@mp.wa.gov.au,
peter.watson@mp.wa.gov.au,
martin.whitely@mp.wa.gov.au,
grant.woodhams@mp.wa.gov.au,
janet.woollard@mp.wa.gov.au,
victoriapark@mp.wa.gov.au,
alison.xamon@mp.wa.gov.au,
"moza35\"" <moza35@bigpond.com>
dateWed, Mar 30, 2011 at 12:34 PM
subjectMORAL RELATIVISM OF DISPARITY IN RULE ENFORCEMENTS - A QUAQMIRE WEST AUSTRALIANS WILL NOT WANT TO FALL INTO
mailed-bygmail.com
hide details 12:34 PM (2 minutes ago)

The Acting Court of Appeal Registrar, Ms. L Bush 
Attention Juliana Loskoska
Supreme Court of Western Australia
Barrack Street, Perth
Email: courtofappeal.office@justice.wa.gov.au

The State Ombudsman of Western Australia
Email: mail@ombudsman.wa.gov.au

The Attorney General of Western Australia
Email:  Minister.Porter@dpc.wa.gov.au

Senior Constable Simon Williams PD09216
simon.williams@police.wa.gov.au;

Crime Corruption Commissioner
Attention Mr. Roger Hellier
Email: Roger.Hellier@ccc.wa.gov.au

The Parliamentary Inspector of Western Australia
Email: piccc@piccc.wa.gov.au;

The Assistant to the Parliamentary Inspector of Western Australia
Email:murray.alder@piccc.wa.gov.au;

Mr. Eddie Hwang, President of Unity Party WA
Email: eddieh@westnet.com.au;

The Leader of the Opposition
The Honourable Eric Ripper
Email: eric.ripper@mp.wa.gov.au,

Carolyn Rogers, Senior Registrar  High Court of Australia
Ph: (02) 6270 6862 Fax: (02) 6273 3025
crogers@hcourt.gov.au
Minister for Police, Ministerial Office:
20th Floor, Governor Stirling Tower, 197 St George's Terrace, PERTH WA 6000  Tel: 9222 9211 Fax: 9321 6003
All Members of Parliament of Western Australia
Dear Sirs
We do not want our justice system in Western Australia to be be involved in implementing one system of law for the privileged few and one system of law for the many ordinary Australians.  We want  the public good for better governance in that our justice system must be fair to all Australians.   I quote the Catholic Bishop Catholic Bishop Paul Tan Che Ing in the following words: 

"If the authorities do not take action against those responsible when laws are flagrantly flouted, then they are engendering a situation where fair is foul and foul is fair."
"This is a dangerous pass, one in which people, especially the young, will think that there is one set of rules for a privileged few and another set of rules for the rest," he added.
"The moral relativism that results from this disparity in rule enforcement is a quagmire from which society will find it very difficult to emerge."

Cheers'
NICHOLAS N CHIN
387, ALEXANDER DRIVE, DIANELLA  WA 6059
Phone: 08 92757440
Mobile: +61421642735
Email: nnchin1@gmail.com; Twitter: nnchin1
Blogspot: Google: NICHOLASNCHIN


2 attachments — Download all attachments   View all images  
CACV41&CIV1491&VR87-CA-SAT-LPCC300311L1 001.jpgCACV41&CIV1491&VR87-CA-SAT-LPCC300311L1 001.jpg
890K   View   Download  
CACV41&CIV1491&VR87-CA-SAT-LPCC300311L1 002.jpgCACV41&CIV1491&VR87-CA-SAT-LPCC300311L1 002.jpg
454K   View   Download  
Posted by at
Labels:

7 comments:

  1. Nicholas N ChinMarch 30, 2011 at 3:30 AM

    NEITHER THE COURT OF APPEAL IN CACV 75 OF 2010 NOR THE HIGH COURT IN P50 OF 2010 GIVE REASON FOR THE ISSUE THAT KEN MARTIN J IS RIGHT IN SO FAR AS THE CONTROVERSY SURROUNDING THE SECURITY COSTS ORDER OF THAT JUDGE IS CONCERNED?
    SO THE ANSWER IS OBVIOUS THAT HASLUCK J IS RIGHT AND THAT KEN MARTIN J IS WRONG. IF THE FORMER IS RIGHT, WHY IS THERE NO REASON IN THE JUDGMENTS OF BOTH THE COURT OF APPEAL AND THE HIGH COURT.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Nicholas N ChinMarch 30, 2011 at 3:33 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nicholas N ChinMarch 30, 2011 at 3:35 AM

    NEITHER DID NEWNES JA GAVE ANY REASON WHY THAT SECURITY COSTS OF KEN MARTIN J IS CORRECT. THAT ISSUE WAS AVOIDED IN CACV 75 OF 2010 BY NEWNES JA. THEREFORE THIS ISSUE HAS NOT BEEN DECIDED.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Nicholas N ChinMarch 30, 2011 at 3:37 AM

    This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nicholas N ChinMarch 30, 2011 at 3:40 AM

    THE HIGH COURT KNOWS THAT HASLUCK CAME FIRST AND KEN MARTIN J CAME SECOND IN THE SECURITY COST ORDER CONTROVERSY. THIS IS THE CHICK-EGG CONTROVERSY - WHICH CAME FIRST, THE CHICKEN OR THE EGG. THE ANSWER TO THIS RIDDLE IS: HASLUCK J CAME FIRST AND KEN MARTIN J CAME LATER. THE HIGH COURT DOES NOT WANT TO SAY WHO IS WRONG AND WHO IS RIGHT. IT IS UP TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO SAY WHO IS RIGHT OR WHO IS WRONG. IT IS FOR THE PUBLIC TO SAY WHETHER OUR COURTS IS IMPLEMENTING OUR LAWS OR IS THERE TWO SETS OF LAWS, ONE FOR THE PRIVLEGED AND ONE FOR THE ORIDINARY FOLKS.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nicholas N ChinMarch 30, 2011 at 3:43 AM

    THE HIGH COURT KNOWS THAT HASLUCK CAME FIRST AND KEN MARTIN J CAME SECOND IN THE SECURITY COST ORDER CONTROVERSY. IT IS UP TO THE GENERAL PUBLIC TO SAY WHO IS RIGHT OR WHO IS WRONG. IS THERE TWO SETS OF LAWS IMPLEMENTED BY OUR COURTS: ONE FOR THE PRIVILEGED AND ONE FOR THE ORDINARY FOLKS.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nicholas N ChinMarch 30, 2011 at 3:48 AM

    HE HIGH COURT POINTED OUT IN P50 OF 2010 THAT THE KEN MARTIN J'S SECURITY COSTS ORDER IN FAVOUR OF SOLICITOR TIMOTHY ROBIN THIES AND AGAINST THE APPELLANT I.E. MYSELF, WAS MADE BEFORE THE S.36 REVIEW BEGAN. THE S.36 REVIEW BEGAN WITH HASLUCK J AND DID NOT END WITH KEN MARTIN J. IT WAS STIFLED BY KEN MARTIN J IN FAVOUR OF THE CONTROVERSIAL SECURITY COSTS ORDER IN FAVOUR OF THE SOLICITOR TIMOTHY ROBIN THIES.

    ReplyDelete

Subscribe to: Post Comments (Atom)