Saturday, April 16, 2011

MR. LAW TODAY PRODUCED A FACSIMILE FROM HIS FORMER SOLICITOR DAVID TAYLOR DATED 15.2.2006 INDICATING THAT THE LATTER PAID THE FEES OF $654.00 (NOT $654.20) ON 15.2.2006

Our Ref: CIV1877-10.  
Saturday, April 16, 2011

Mr. Anthony Prime
McCallum Donovan Sweeney
Level 12, 16 Irwin Street PERTH WA 6000
Ref: AMP/10479                                            BY FACSIMILE: 08 9221 2220


Dear Sir

CACV 107 OF 2008: CHIN V HALL  & ANOR: FRESH MATERIAL EVIDENCE OF FRAUD OF DAVID TAYLOR

I refer to page 42 of the Green Appeal Book dated, filed and served 29.4.2009 in CAV107 of 2008.  Mr. Maurice Law as the Second Respondent was served with this document.  This page indicates that David Taylor was sent a facsimile dated 15.2.2006 at 12.34 pm by me from my office that was received by him and caused him to act by filing the Writ of Summons in CIV 1131 of 2006 only on 15.2.2006 and not on 10.2.2006.  This proves conclusively that the Affidavit of David Taylor sworn 29.3.2007 contains perjured evidence to the effect that the Writ was filed on 10.2.2006 with the total fees paid of $654.20 paid on the same day.  I also refer to page 136 of the Yellow Appeal Book filed in CACV 107 of 2008 which indicates conclusively that Registrar Powell covered up for the perjury of David Taylor Solicitor by falsifying the court records.  Attached is a copy of an invoice which was provided to me by Mr. Maurice Frederick Law today and which is dated 15.2.2006 at 1.08 pm.   This Invoice bears the name of David Taylor Solicitors and it indicates that the sum of $654.00 and NOT $654.20 was paid by David Taylor at the time of the filing of CIV1131 of 2006 on the 16.2.2006 and not the 10.2.2006.   Therefore, there is no longer any doubt that the CIV 1131 of 2006 was not commenced on 10.2.2006 in compliance with the Orders of Jenkins J in CIV 1142 of 2005 delivered on 19.1.2006.  Therefore, the caveats of Spunter Pty Ltd was removed by me as the then solicitor for the late Nancy Hall by way of operation of law in accordance with the provisions of s. 138C(2)(a) of the Transfer of Land Act, 1893 WA and I have thus established my rights to become the salvor of the estate of the Nancy Hall as from the 10.2.2006 or thereabouts  


Yours faithfully



NICHOLAS N CHIN



Court of Appeal Registrar
Supreme Court of Western Australia
Court of Appeal
Stirling Gardens, Barrack Street
PERTH WA 6000 Phone: 94215333 Fax: 94215471  BY FACSIMILE
Associate to Court of Appeal Registrar: Maria Santos Bond
Associate to Commissioner Sleight: CIV 1877 of 2010
 
Mr C L Zelestis, QC Chairperson
Law Complaints Officer: Ms D Howell    
Phone: (08) 9461 2299 Fax: (08) 9461 2265 Email: lpcc@lpbwa.com    
2nd Floor Colonial Building, 55 St George's Terrace, PERTH WA 6000    
Office Box Z5293, St George's Terrace, PERTH WA 6831
Atten: Ms. Le Miere                             BY FACSIMILE
 
Enc. 
 

5 comments:

  1. THERE IS NO LONGER ANY DOUBT THAT THE LEARNED REGISTRAR POWELL'S LETTER RELIED UPON BY HIS HONOUR OWEN JA IN PARA. 54 AND 55 OF THE FIRST JUDGMENT OF THE SECONDARY DECISION MAKER IN CACV 107 OF 2008 IS BEING MISPLACED.

    ReplyDelete
  2. THERE IS NO LONGER ANY DOUBT THAT REGISTRAR'S POWELL'S 20 CENTS COVER UP STORY IS A SOPHISTRY OR A WRONG ARGUMENT ADVANCED IN COURT BY THE LEARNED REGISTRAR HIMSELF TO HELP DAVID TAYLOR IN HIS PERJURED EVIDENCE.

    ReplyDelete
  3. THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT I DO NOT WANT TO HARM DAVID TAYLOR SOLICITOR AND WANTED TO SETTLE THIS MATTER WITH HIM BUT IT WAS IMPOSSIBLE FOR ME TO DO SO.

    ReplyDelete
  4. THERE IS NO DOUBT THAT THE LPCC KEEP ON HARMING ME ON THE ISSUE THAT I WAS MAKING FALSE ALLEGATIONS AGAINST DAVID TAYLOR SOLICITOR AND THE ONLY WAY OUT FOR ME IS TO PROVE MY CASE TO THE HILT. I MEANT NO HARM TO ANYONE BUT SOME ONE WANTS TO KEEP HARMING ME AND I HAVE TO DEFEND MYSELF.

    ReplyDelete
  5. THIS DOCUMENT PRESENTED BY MAURICE LAW TO ME PROVES CONCLUSIVELY THAT CIV 1131 OF 2006 WAS FILED ON 15.2.2006 AND THAT HAPPENED BECAUSE DAVID TAYLOR SOLICITOR WAS ALERTED BY ME TO DO WITH MY FACSIMILE LETTER TO HIM DATED 15.2.2006 AT 12.34 PM AND HE FILED THE WRIT AND PAID THE DEPOSIT OF THE FULL COURT FEES ON 15.2.2008 ONLYK AT 1.08 PM ON THE SAME DAY WITH A CHEQUE. SUBSEQUENTLY, WHEN HE FOUND OUT THAT THE FULL FEES OF $654.20 NEEDS TO BE PAID, HE PAID IT BY CREDIT CARD ON 16.2.2008.

    ReplyDelete