Mr C L Zelestis, QC Chairperson Law Complaints Officer: Ms D Howell Phone: (08) 9461 2299 Fax: (08) 9461 2265 Email: lpcc@lpbwa.com 2nd Floor Colonial Building, 55 St George's Terrace, PERTH WA 6000 Office Box Z5293, St George's Terrace, PERTH WA 6831Atten: Ms. Le Miere
The Attorney General of WA the Hon. C Christian Porter MLA
Level 21, Governor Stirling Tower,
197, St. Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6000
Email: Minister.Porter@dpc.wa.gov.au
Dear Sirs
VR 87 OF 2009: LPCC V CHIN I refer to the above matter and to the response letter of your Ms. G Roberts dated 15.4.2011 to the email letter of the President of Unity Party WA to the LPCC dated 13.4.2011 (the President’s letter). The President’s letter attaches the letter of the Attorney General of WA to him dated 12.4.2011 advising the President to use his independent good offices to help me, subject to conditions, as indicated in Attorney General’s letter, for the purpose of enabling the President to address the issue as to why I have been unfairly dealt with by Ms. Le Miere (the Attorney General’s Letter). Your Ms. G. Roberts’ response letter to the President’s Letter and the Attorney General Letter is to the effect that the Unity Party of WA does not have a direct personal interest in the above matter before the LPCC, BUT I am not going to enter into a dispute with you regarding it. Instead, I wish to adopt the contents of the President’s Letter and to state categorically to you that the LPCC do need to respond to me on the issue of the inequitable treatment of Ms. Le Miere meted out to me on 8.4.2011before the Deputy President of SAT, Judge Sharp, which “derailed” the settlement process of VR87 of 2009 that was hitherto sailing on an even keel (the inequitable treatment). The inequitable treatment had resulted in the tribunal setting down the wrong issues for trial in VR87 of 2009 on 11.10.2011 for three days, instead of the real issues that should only be focused on why the Pseudo Board and the LPCC went on a frolic of their own to abuse my human rights by taking away my independent legal practice status as a lawyer in Western Australia to protect certain vested interests, how I should be compensated for these continuing wrongs done to me since 12.6.2006 till today and when they should put a stop to these wrongs. These wrongs are to be defined in terms of the Thies, Taylor, the Pseudo Board and Consent Judgment disputes, which when properly defined, will put an end to the disputes of all irrelevant side issues. Yours faithfully NICHOLAS N CHIN
The Attorney General of WA the Hon. C Christian Porter MLA
Level 21, Governor Stirling Tower,
197, St. Georges Terrace
Perth WA 6000
Email: Minister.Porter@dpc.wa.gov.au
Dear Sirs
VR 87 OF 2009: LPCC V CHIN I refer to the above matter and to the response letter of your Ms. G Roberts dated 15.4.2011 to the email letter of the President of Unity Party WA to the LPCC dated 13.4.2011 (the President’s letter). The President’s letter attaches the letter of the Attorney General of WA to him dated 12.4.2011 advising the President to use his independent good offices to help me, subject to conditions, as indicated in Attorney General’s letter, for the purpose of enabling the President to address the issue as to why I have been unfairly dealt with by Ms. Le Miere (the Attorney General’s Letter). Your Ms. G. Roberts’ response letter to the President’s Letter and the Attorney General Letter is to the effect that the Unity Party of WA does not have a direct personal interest in the above matter before the LPCC, BUT I am not going to enter into a dispute with you regarding it. Instead, I wish to adopt the contents of the President’s Letter and to state categorically to you that the LPCC do need to respond to me on the issue of the inequitable treatment of Ms. Le Miere meted out to me on 8.4.2011before the Deputy President of SAT, Judge Sharp, which “derailed” the settlement process of VR87 of 2009 that was hitherto sailing on an even keel (the inequitable treatment). The inequitable treatment had resulted in the tribunal setting down the wrong issues for trial in VR87 of 2009 on 11.10.2011 for three days, instead of the real issues that should only be focused on why the Pseudo Board and the LPCC went on a frolic of their own to abuse my human rights by taking away my independent legal practice status as a lawyer in Western Australia to protect certain vested interests, how I should be compensated for these continuing wrongs done to me since 12.6.2006 till today and when they should put a stop to these wrongs. These wrongs are to be defined in terms of the Thies, Taylor, the Pseudo Board and Consent Judgment disputes, which when properly defined, will put an end to the disputes of all irrelevant side issues. Yours faithfully NICHOLAS N CHIN
The Associate to His Honour Judge Timothy Sharp
Deputy President of State Administrative Tribunal
Ground Floor 12 St Georges Terrace Perth GPO Box U1991, Perth 6845
Ph: (08) 9219 3111; Fax:(08) 9325 5099
Ground Floor 12 St Georges Terrace Perth GPO Box U1991, Perth 6845
Ph: (08) 9219 3111; Fax:(08) 9325 5099
Attention: Candice BY FACSIMILE
No comments:
Post a Comment